The Washington Post

Major D.C. building height changes are rejected by planning commission

A planning body charged with examining changes to the federal law restricting building heights in the District declined to endorse major changes Tuesday, voting to reject a recommendation to potentially allow higher structures in outlying parts of the city.

The National Capital Planning Commission voted 7 to 3 to remove language from a staff report that said the 1910 Height of Buildings Act should be amended to exempt areas of the city outside the historic core planned in the 18th century by Pierre L’Enfant. Instead, the report will say that the issue is worthy of further study and future consideration.

Without that recommendation in the commission’s final report, it is unlikely that Congress will entertain significant changes to the law. It is a setback for Mayor Vincent C. Gray (D) and his planning director, Harriet Tregoning, who have argued that the height restrictions should be loosened somewhat to accommodate the future growth of the city.

Tregoning, who is Gray’s representative on the commission, was among the votes in favor of relaxing the current building-heights limits.

The idea of relaxing building heights in the city has been deeply controversial, even among city officials. Tregoning was joined by mayoral appointee Robert E. Miller, but mayoral appointee Arrington Dixon and D.C. Council Chairman Phil Mendelson, who also sits on the commission, voted to maintain the status quo.

With the exception of presidential appointee Elizabeth Ann White, the commission members representing federal elected officials and agencies voted against making significant changes.

Peter May, a National Park Service official, said the commission’s action is “affirming that this law contributes to a unique and special experience” for District residents and visitors.

Building heights in the city are “a matter of national interest,” he said. “It is about quality, it is about human scale, it is about being a welcoming city, not an imposing city.”

The vote came Tuesday evening after three hours of public testimony, some of it highly charged and almost all of it against making any significant changes to the federal law.

The commission’s report will be forwarded to the House Oversight and Government Reform Committee, whose chairman, Rep. Darrell Issa (R-Calif.), requested the study last year. Ali Ahmad, a spokesman for Issa, said the committee expects to hold a hearing next month on the final recommendations.

Mike DeBonis covers Congress and national politics for The Washington Post. He previously covered D.C. politics and government from 2007 to 2015.

The Freddie Gray case

Please provide a valid email address.

You’re all set!

Campaign 2016 Email Updates

Please provide a valid email address.

You’re all set!
Show Comments
Most Read



Success! Check your inbox for details.

See all newsletters

Close video player
Now Playing

To keep reading, please enter your email address.

You’ll also receive from The Washington Post:
  • A free 6-week digital subscription
  • Our daily newsletter in your inbox

Please enter a valid email address

I have read and agree to the Terms of Service and Privacy Policy.

Please indicate agreement.

Thank you.

Check your inbox. We’ve sent an email explaining how to set up an account and activate your free digital subscription.