The Washington Post

Baker, Jacobs square off over Prince George’s County schools takeover plan

Prince George’s County Executive Rushern Baker. (Mark Gail/The Washington Post)

The chairman of the Prince George’s school board on Saturday lashed out at County Executive Rushern L. Baker III, calling his plan to take over operations of the county’s public schools a “last minute power grab.”

In her sharpest public comments to date, Verjeana Jacobs (District 5) said such a shift in power away from the elected school board could contribute to further instability in a system seeking its sixth superintendent in more than a decade. “It is a major structural change unaccompanied by a plan,” she said.

Baker (D) and Jacobs sparred publicly about the proposal for the first time at a county House delegation meeting. With two weeks left before the Maryland General Assembly adjourns, Baker conceded that the timing was not ideal. But he told state lawmakers that it was imperative that changes be made before a new superintendent for the 123,000 student system is hired.

“We can’t kick it down the road anymore,” Baker said.

Delegates from the county on Saturday said they agreed that the system is in need of a major overhaul. The question is: Who should be granted control? The county executive, who has little legal authority over the school system and would like more? The nine-member elected school board? Or a combination of the two?

Baker last week unveiled a proposal that would give him direct charge of the school superintendent and the school system’s $1.7 billion budget, a move that would significantly limit the role of the Board of Education. He has examined similar proposals from big, urban school districts and said some of what worked in those communities could help Prince George’s fix its system and be more competitive in the Washington region.

Baker and Jacobs met privately Friday but reached no agreement on how to move forward.

On Saturday, Jacobs told lawmakers that the issues facing the county’s 204 public schools are complex and that changing the leadership won’t fix some of the root causes. She described a student population with a growing number of children with special needs and from low-income families.

“They come to us behind, and we spend the next 12 years getting them where they need to be,” she said.

But Baker said that after 20 years of trying different governing structures — an elected board, an appointed board, an oversight panel — profound problems persist, even if there are some signs of improvement.

“We are making progress in our educational system, but we haven’t done it fast enough,” he said. “Right now we don’t have anybody responsible,” he said. “When you have nine people responsible, you don’t have anybody responsible.”

Several lawmakers described the frustrations of dealing with an 18,000-employee system that they said is often unresponsive to parents or anyone who might need assistance. They questioned whether the board was willing to be held accountable for the problems.

Del. Geraldine Valentino-Smith (D-Prince George’s) said she has tried to win school board support in the past two years for legislation that would offer the public more information about contracts and spending practices, but has been repeatedly rebuffed by the school board.

“This year I came in and said ‘Can we please put together a task force and look at best practices,’ ” she said. “It was vehemently opposed by the school board.”

But some questioned whether a takeover by the county executive is the answer. Del. Aisha N. Braveboy (D-Prince George’s) argued that Baker is “making a change just for the sake of making a change,” and she suggested that an outside expert be brought in to assess the system.

“Why don’t we give this issue the level of importance it deserves and give it a study like we give other important issues,” she said.

Lawmakers said they would examine Baker’s plan closely. Two public hearings are planned before the legislative session ends April 8. Baker also plans to hold a telephone “town hall” meeting Tuesday night.

“I am not happy that this is here at this time with so little preparation,” said Del. Anne Healey (D-Prince George’s) .

“We are going to deal with it, go through it line by line, piece by piece and figure out if anything in here will advance our school system,” she said.

Baker told the lawmakers that the next move is theirs.

“That is why you were elected, to make tough choices,” he said. “By the next election, you will know and people will know about what choice you will have made.”



Success! Check your inbox for details. You might also like:

Please enter a valid email address

See all newsletters

Show Comments
Most Read



Success! Check your inbox for details.

See all newsletters

Your Three. Videos curated for you.
Play Videos
Deaf banjo player teaches thousands
Unconventional warfare with a side of ale
It's in the details: Five ways to enhance your kitchen makeover
Play Videos
Drawing as an act of defiance
A fighter pilot helmet with 360 degrees of sky
Border collies: A 'mouse trap' for geese on the National Mall
Play Videos
Bao: The signature dish of San Francisco
This man's job is binge-watching for Netflix
What you need to know about Planned Parenthood
Play Videos
How to save and spend money at college
Pandas, from birth to milk to mom
Europe's migrant crisis, explained

To keep reading, please enter your email address.

You’ll also receive from The Washington Post:
  • A free 6-week digital subscription
  • Our daily newsletter in your inbox

Please enter a valid email address

I have read and agree to the Terms of Service and Privacy Policy.

Please indicate agreement.

Thank you.

Check your inbox. We’ve sent an email explaining how to set up an account and activate your free digital subscription.