Former Army intelligence analyst Chelsea Manning appeared Tuesday in Alexandria federal court, where she unsuccessfully fought a subpoena requiring her to testify in front of a grand jury investigating WikiLeaks founder Julian Assange.
Outside the courthouse after an hour-long closed hearing, Manning said her motion to quash the subpoena was denied but her team believes they “still have grounds to litigate.” She would not go into detail because U.S. District Judge Claude M. Hilton also blocked her bid to unseal the proceedings. But she said she was “probably going to be” at the courthouse multiple times in coming days.
U.S. Attorney G. Zachary Terwilliger attended the closed hearing, as did the Assange prosecutorial team — Assistant U.S. Attorneys Gordon Kromberg, Tracy McCormick, Thomas W. Traxler and Kellen Dwyer.
Manning, 31, was convicted of the largest leak of classified documents in U.S. history and served seven years of a 35-year military prison sentence before being released in 2017 by then-President Barack Obama.
The material she exposed included field reports from Iraq and Afghanistan, cables between the State Department and U.S. embassies and assessments of detainees held at Guantanamo Bay, Cuba.
During Manning’s 2011 military trial, prosecutors revealed chat logs showing the Army private chatted with Assange about anonymously cracking a password to a computer. But during the trial Manning testified she acted alone and approached other news organizations before going to WikiLeaks. The anti-secrecy website published the material.
In a statement Friday, Manning said she stood by that testimony and sees no reason to repeat it.
Outside the courthouse Tuesday, Manning did not mention Assange or WikiLeaks, saying she opposed grand juries as a principle.
“Grand juries are terrible tools,” she said. “The idea that there is an independent grand jury is long gone; it’s run by a prosecutor.” Witnesses do not have their own lawyer in the secret proceedings, she noted: “There is no adversarial process. . . . I am generally opposed to the existence of a grand jury.”
“There was an awful lot of government attorneys in there,” she told a crowd of reporters and activists. But, she said, “we didn’t learn anything” about why the government had subpoenaed her now, years after her conviction. “I only can speculate,” she said.
She was represented in court by Moira Meltzer-Cohen, Sandra Freeman and Chris Leibig.
Prosecutors inadvertently exposed that Assange had been charged under seal late last year, but the nature of the charges against him remain unknown. U.S. officials, speaking on the condition of anonymity because of grand jury secrecy, say the case is based on his pre-2016 conduct, not the election hacks that drew the attention of special counsel Robert S. Mueller III.
Assange has for the past seven years been living in asylum at the Ecuadoran Embassy in London, after a warrant was issued for his arrest in a Swedish sexual assault investigation. That case has been dropped, but Assange is still wanted by British authorities for skipping bond and has resisted leaving the embassy for fear of extradition to the United States.
A group of supporters cheered as Manning left the courthouse, shouting “We love you Chelsea!” and waving signs saying, “Solidarity with Chelsea” and “Defend Grand Jury Resistance.”
Ellen Nakashima contributed to this report.