The Washington PostDemocracy Dies in Darkness

Neomi Rao pressed on past writings on date rape at hearing on her judicial nomination

Neomi Rao, the head of the White House Office of Information and Regulatory Affairs, faced questioning from senators of both parties about her past writings at a hearing on her judicial nomination. (Zach Gibson/Getty Images)

Senators in both parties Tuesday pressed Neomi Rao — President Trump’s nominee to replace Brett M. Kavanaugh on the federal appeals court in Washington — about her past controversial writings, including about victims of date rape.

Rao, an advocate for broad presidential power, spent more than a decade as a law professor before she joined the Trump administration in 2017 as the White House’s regulatory czar.

Rao, 45, faces opposition from civil rights groups and Democratic senators concerned about her work to roll back government regulations and about provocative columns she wrote as a college student.

She also encountered resistance Tuesday from Republican Sen. Joni Ernst (Iowa), who recently disclosed that she had been sexually assaulted while in college. Rao’s writings from the 1990s on date rape “do give me pause,” Ernst said during the Senate Judiciary Committee hearing.

The senator said she is concerned about the message Rao’s columns send to young women “about who is to blame” and has not decided whether to back Rao’s nomination. “I really want to know more,” Ernst said in an interview.

Republican Sen. Joni Ernst says she is a survivor of sexual assault

Rao told senators that she cringes “at some of the language I used” in columns she wrote as an undergraduate at Yale.

“I like to think I’ve matured as a thinker, writer and a person,” she said. And Rao emphasized that “nobody should blame the victim.”

More than a dozen people, mostly young women, lined up outside the committee room Tuesday wearing black T-shirts with quotes from Rao’s column on date rape and the message #RejectRao.

Trump tapped Rao in November to succeed Kavanaugh, who served a dozen years on the U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit before his elevation to the Supreme Court. Her nomination comes as Trump has installed a record number of appeals court judges across the country — more than any other president two years into a term.

The Judiciary Committee’s new chairman, Sen. Lindsey O. Graham (R-S.C.), is moving quickly to confirm additional judges. The panel is scheduled to vote Thursday on a slate of nominees, including a half-dozen appeals court picks.

Two years in, Trump’s appeals court confirmations at a historic high point

The D.C. Circuit is often referred to as the nation’s second-highest court because it reviews high-profile cases involving government regulations and separation-of-powers issues, and because it has been something of a pipeline to the Supreme Court. Four current justices previously served on the D.C. Circuit.

In recent years, the appeals court has ruled on cases involving gun-control laws, the Trump administration’s restrictions on transgender troops and the use of military commissions to prosecute terrorism suspects.

But questions about Rao’s early writing, rather than the court’s docket, dominated the discussion Tuesday. In a 1994 column, Rao wrote: “It has always seemed self-evident to me that even if I drank a lot, I would still be responsible for my actions. A man who rapes a drunk girl should be prosecuted. At the same time, a good way to avoid a potential date rape is to stay reasonably sober.”

Rao said at the hearing that her suggestion about women and alcohol was meant as a “common-sense observation” about “actions women can take to be less likely to become victims.”

Rao was rated “well qualified” by the American Bar Association this week, and Republican senators defended her record. Sen. Ted Cruz (R-Tex.) noted that she was unequivocal in the 1990s — and now — that anyone who commits a crime of violence should be prosecuted. Her suggestion that college students avoid excessive drinking, he said, is good advice, and he intends to give it to his own children.

“There is certainly nothing disqualifying here,” Sen. Mike Lee (R-Utah) said. “Judicial nominations have become a blood sport,” he added, a reference to lingering bitterness over Kavanaugh’s contentious confirmation battle.

Kavanaugh was confirmed by a narrow margin after California professor Christine Blasey Ford accused him of sexually assaulting her when both were teenagers — allegations he vehemently denied.

Senate Democrats also pressed Rao on her more recent legal writing and her work as head of the Trump administration’s Office of Information and Regulatory Affairs. Rao’s academic papers suggest that her approach would be similar to Kavanaugh’s when it comes to presidential power. She has expressed support for limiting the power of independent federal agencies.

Kavanaugh cited one of Rao’s articles in his 2016 opinion finding the structure of the government’s consumer watchdog agency unconstitutional, writing in part that it gives too much executive control to a “single, unaccountable, unchecked director.”

She has also called on the courts to revisit a doctrine known as “Chevron deference,” which says judges should defer to federal agencies to interpret ambiguously worded laws, as long as the agencies’ decisions are reasonable.

Sen. Christopher A. Coons (D-Del.) called Rao’s sweeping view of presidential authority “so outside the mainstream and alarming for the scope and reach of executive power.”

Rao distinguished between the role of a legal scholar and that of a judge. If confirmed, she said, “I would put aside those academic views and follow the precedent of the Supreme Court.”

The committee’s top Democrat, Sen. Dianne Feinstein (Calif.), expressed concern about Rao’s involvement in the Trump administration’s effort to pull back Obama-era environmental regulations and protections against wage discrimination. The little-known but powerful office Rao leads is charged with reviewing agency regulations.

Feinstein asked whether Rao, if confirmed, would recuse herself from lawsuits before the D.C. Circuit involving agency rules that she reviewed in her role with the administration.

“I will not say yes, I will not say no. It is something I will consider,” Rao responded.

Trump’s pick for rules czar would hand more power to the president

Before turning to teaching, Rao worked in all three branches of government. She graduated from Yale in 1995, earned a law degree at the University of Chicago, and clerked for Judge J. Harvie Wilkinson III on the Richmond-based 4th Circuit and for Justice Clarence Thomas at the Supreme Court.

She served as nominations counsel for then-Senate Judiciary Committee Chairman Orrin G. Hatch (R-Utah) and as associate counsel to President George W. Bush, where she worked on judicial nominations.

At George Mason University, Rao founded the Center for the Study of the Administrative State and was an outspoken supporter of naming the law school for the late justice Antonin Scalia.

Rao and her husband, Alan Lefkowitz, live in Washington and have two children.

Elected officials cannot silence critics on social media, appeals court rules

Navy veterans from Vietnam War win Agent Orange benefits case

One illegal gun, 12 weeks. A dozen criminal acts. The rapid cycle of gun violence.

Local newsletters: Local headlines (8 a.m.) | Afternoon Buzz (4 p.m.)

Like PostLocal on Facebook | Follow @postlocal on Twitter | Latest local news

Loading...