“Our goal was to achieve an incentive for members who are ready to end their postal careers; to ensure that no groups of employees are excluded, and to lessen the hardships of excessing for those who remain,” union President Cliff Guffey said. “This agreement accomplishes those objectives.”
The Postal Service said 115,155 employees, including clerks, mechanics, drivers, custodians and some administrative personnel represented by the APWU, are eligible for the buyout, and 15,000 to 20,000 are expected to take it.
Though announced this week, the buyout agreement was signed last Friday, two days before the Postal Service defaulted on a $5.6 billion payment to the Treasury to prefund retiree health benefits. It also missed an August payment of $5.5 billion.
The Postal Service, which gets no tax money for its operating expenses, posted a third-quarter loss of $5.2 billion, significantly greater than its $3.1 billion loss for the same April-June period last year.
The agency announced in May that it was working with its unions on retirement incentives.
“The Postal Service has reduced the size of its workforce by 244,000 career employees since 2000 without resorting to layoffs,” Megan Brennan, the Postal Service’s chief operating officer, said at the time. “We are a responsible employer, and we will work with our employees to ensure a smooth transition to a much leaner organization.”
Part of that transition is the ongoing move to close postal facilities and consolidate operations. The current plan calls for closing 140 mail processing plants, out of 461, by February and shutting 89 others by February 2014. That timetable could change, as it has before, if “circumstances of the Postal Service change in the interim,” an agency news release said.
“When fully implemented in late 2014, the Postal Service expects its network consolidations to generate approximately $2.1 billion in annual cost reductions and lead to total workforce reduction up to 28,000 employees,” it said.
The buyouts are a small part of a larger strategy the Postal Service is pursuing in hope of digging out of a deep financial hole. Postmaster General Patrick Donahoe has a five-pronged legislative wish list that would allow five-day, instead of six-day, mail delivery; change the mandate to prefund retiree health benefits; refund to the USPS $11 billion in pension plan overpayments; remake the workers’ compensation program; and allow the Postal Service to offer a greater range of products.
He also wants to withdraw postal employees from the Federal Employees Health Benefits Program in favor of an agency-run program, but it is unlikely the unions would approve of that.
The Service Employees International Union (SEIU) is trying to get jobs back for 17 people who clean a Department of Homeland Security building on Nebraska Avenue in Northwest Washington.
The cleaners work for Diversified Service Group of Silver Spring. In a lawsuit filed in federal court last week, the union’s Local 32BJ said the company fired the workers in June without cause shortly after Diversified took over a contract to clean the facility. The workers also filed a petition in August with the General Services Administration (GSA), which maintains the property
Diversified referred questions about the lawsuit to its attorney, who could not be reached. The GSA said that while it “has no authority over personnel decisions made by a private contractor, the agency will continue to monitor this contractor to ensure they are following applicable contracting regulations and guidelines.”
The petition from the employees to the GSA said, “Though many of us worked at that site for years without incident, we were terminated without cause.”
The petition calls on the GSA to enforce Executive Order 13495, which was signed by President Obama in 2009. The order on “Nondisplacement of Qualified Workers Under Service Contracts” says: “The Federal Government’s procurement interests in economy and efficiency are served when the successor contractor hires the predecessor’s employees.”
The lawsuit says the unionized workers were employed by a previous contractor but were dismissed after Diversified won the account to clean the building. The SEIU said that in its Memorandum of Understanding with Diversified, the company agreed “to hire the incumbent employees and maintain their current terms and conditions of employment.”
After the employees were dismissed, Diversified told the union that the memo “does not constitute an enforceable agreement” and that the company did not have to abide by the union contract, according to the lawsuit.
The SEIU is asking the court to force Diversified to honor the memorandum and the collective bargaining agreement, which says that “the employer shall only discipline or discharge employees for just cause.”
The GSA, according to the employee petition, “should expect its contractors to obey the executive order because it is practical and just, and would prevent the hardship we are experiencing now.”
Previous columns by Joe Davidson are available at wapo.st/JoeDavidson.