“I can take you out and show you stuff that will make you just grin from ear to ear, and stuff that will make you cry within 50 yards of each other,” said Williams, 76. “After seeing what I’ve seen on these rivers over the last 35 years, I’ll say this: I won’t bet against anything. I won’t bet against the Anacostia being swimmable again within this century. But it’s a long grind. And you have to keep supporting the programs and efforts that are actually helping to make that happen.”
Williams and others attribute the ecosystem’s steady and significant recovery to a complex web of federal, state and private restoration efforts coordinated by the Environmental Protection Agency’s Chesapeake Bay Program, a partnership among six states and the District that has existed since 1983.
President Trump earlier this month released a federal budget proposal that would cut EPA funding for the program by 90 percent.
It is the third time the president has proposed a dramatic slash in funding for the Chesapeake Bay as part of EPA budget cuts. Last year, he recommended a similar 90 percent chop. In 2017, he suggested eliminating federal contributions to the Chesapeake restoration effort altogether.
In both cases, Congress rejected the president’s proposals and restored funding to the program. Lawmakers say they expect a similar repudiation this year. But Will Baker, president of the Chesapeake Bay Foundation, said “spending political capital” to convince members of Congress to fight for the program’s survival has no guarantees.
The program received $73 million in federal funding for this fiscal year. The Trump administration’s 2020 budget proposal would make that $7.3 million.
A cut that drastic would have dire consequences for the bay and residents of the Washington area, Baker and Williams said.
“It wouldn’t happen fast, but once it started to degrade again, it would be bloody hell to turn back around,” Williams said.
Those who work along the estuary like to compare its recovery to a sick patient in the early stages of remission. Would you stop the patient’s supply of lifesaving medicine, they ask? Eliminate doctors’ visits? Cut their health insurance?
“Of course not,” said John Flood, 63, a marine consultant and longtime environmental activist from Annapolis. “This patient is about to get up out of the hospital bed and get back to a functioning life again. This is the worst possible time to take funds away. It’s time for all hands on deck.”
Scientists say the Chesapeake Bay ecosystem is the healthiest it has been in generations.
Species thought to be long gone are making a comeback. Signs of natural resilience have returned. That means the nation’s largest estuary is better able to recover on its own from setbacks — like last year’s record-setting rainfall, which offset the natural salinity of many of the region’s waterways.
But experts worry the Chesapeake Bay might not be able to weather a drastic budget cut on its own.
“The recovery is fragile,” Baker said. “We certainly know that. We saw the impact of record-breaking rainfall last year. When a system is in recovery and the recovery is fragile, the worst thing to do is pull the rug out from under the very programs that are improving it and making it stronger.”
More than two-thirds of the $73 million the program receives from the EPA goes toward supporting the efforts of state and local governments and other partners. The money is used for restoring and conserving healthy habitats, supporting sustainable fisheries and reining in pollution and waste runoff, according to Chesapeake Promise, an effort to publicly track the program’s progress and finances.
The remaining one-third goes toward in-house work by the Chesapeake Bay Program, including the collection of data, scientific research, monitoring, modeling and reporting on the state of the ecosystem.
In addition to EPA funding, the District and the participating states — Delaware, Maryland, New York, Pennsylvania, Virginia and West Virginia — each contribute tens of millions of dollars annually. Other federal agencies, including the Department of Agriculture, Department of Defense and Department of the Interior, also provide funding or program-specific support.
Republican and Democratic lawmakers have signaled support for the program and promised to fight to maintain funding at or near current levels.
“As I have in the past, I will fight to restore funding so generations to come can enjoy this treasure and our thriving tourist, seafood and boating industry will continue to flourish,” Sen. Chris Van Hollen (D-Md.) wrote in a tweet.
Rep. Andy Harris, Maryland’s only Republican member of Congress, told the Baltimore Sun he supports current funding levels for the Chesapeake Bay Program and would work with the House Appropriations Committee to shift money back into it.
Rep. Elaine Luria (D-Va.) went a step further and called on Congress to pass the Chesapeake Bay Program Reauthorization Act — a measure introduced in the House and Senate this year that would provide $90 million in funding for fiscal year 2020 and increase federal support by $500,000 a year for the next five years.
“When you break it down to individuals, personal relationships, petty politics falls aside and we all understand we need to keep this campsite clean,” Flood said. “Whether you’re a Republican or a Democrat, we all want clean water, we all want our kids to have a healthy world and we’d like to think that we’re doing a good job of protecting that. But this is their natural trust fund, and we have squandered it.”
Out on the water, advocates say the consequences of ebbing federal support become less abstract.
Williams, who has roamed the Chesapeake Bay’s waterways for more than 50 years, said before the program instituted an interstate dialogue, data sharing and unified priorities, efforts to clean up and preserve the bay were fragmented and ineffective.
He said he thinks the debate over dollars and cents misses the point.
“What’s clean water worth to a city like Washington?” he said. “The cleaner the water is coming out of western Maryland, the less money the District has to spend cleaning up your drinking water. . . . What about tourism? Do you think tourists will want to go out and look at cherry blossoms around the Tidal Basin when the water smells like sewage?”
Williams has seen over the past three decades what state, federal and private collaboration can do.
A few years ago, efforts to rebuild oyster habitats led a group of researchers, engineers, divers and watermen to install a concrete barge full of shell and baby oysters on the floor of the Severn River to see if they would stay and build a reef.
A single oyster can filter algae and other contaminants out of up to 50 gallons of bay water every day. If one oyster lived for five years, it could filter more than 91,000 gallons of water.
Now, there’s an oyster reef where the barge went in, Williams said. And it’s getting bigger every year.
As Williams navigates up and down the Severn on the old boat he named First Light, he gestures to the water’s surface and remarks on the progress below.
The oysters, once nearly wiped out in the Chesapeake’s waterways, have in some places become a “navigational hazard,” meaning they’re too big to safely sail over. In other areas, the sea grass gets so thick, Williams said, he can’t drive his boat through it without getting stuck.
“There’s life in this river,” he said. “I cannot tell you what it’s worth to actually watch some of it start to heal.”
Sitting on a perch above one such patch of underwater vegetation this past week, an osprey let out a series of chirps. Williams looked up. It was the first osprey he’s seen this year.
“Why, hello, pretty bird,” he said. “Listen to that song.”
Williams doesn’t want the ospreys, which migrate to the Chesapeake Bay each spring, to dwindle and disappear — again.
In the mid-1970s, an estimated low of 1,450 breeding pairs called the Chesapeake Bay home. Today, as many as 10,000 breeding pairs live in the estuary, according to estimates from the Center for Conservation Biology.
Williams notes the bird sighting in his daily log, which includes water measurements, salinity readings and observations.
His records, kept in small yellow notebooks, tell the story of the bay.
Its oxygen levels and signs of life. Its fragile recovery, its uncertain future.