Traffic passes a construction zone at the interchange of U.S. Highway 65 and Interstate 80, on May 30, 2014, in Altoona, Iowa. (Charlie Neibergall/AP)

With Congress on the brink of another failure at the end of this month, the usual bickering over who is to blame for not passing a promised long-term transportation bill was in full bloom Thursday on Capitol Hill.

“Our friends on the other side of the aisle haven’t issued a peep about what to do about it,” Sen. Charles E. Schumer (D-N.Y.) said, flanked by four Democratic colleagues at an afternoon news conference. “Please tell us how you intend to avoid a highway shutdown.”

The only plausible answer appears to be extending the current extension, which expires May 31.

Another extension would be the 33rd time in six years that Congress has faltered when faced with the need for a new transportation authorization measure. Each misstep matters to state transportation authorities who count on federal funding as they map their multi-year project plans. And it matters to thousands of construction workers who rely on those highway jobs.

“This is the summer construction season,” said Sen. Benjamin L. Cardin (D-Md.), ticking off projects in his state that he said were in jeopardy. “Every one of these projects requires a long-term partnership with the federal government.”

There is no agreement in Congress even on how long the next extension ought to be. Some say it should last until the fiscal year ends Sept. 30, others want it extended until the end of the calendar year, and there is a push to pick a July date to “force the hand” of Congress to pass a long-term bill.

There is little about past history or politics to suggest that a forcing of the hand will produce results.

The May 31 deadline for passing a bill — the date that the current extension is set to expire — was itself a product of partisan contention.

The Democrats, fearing they might lose control of the Senate, began to push for a long-term bill last year. Republicans, suspecting that they might win that chamber, argued that passage of a new bill should wait until a new Congress arrived and got settled.

That’s how May 31 was selected.

More than simply pressing for passage of a long-term bill, Schumer and his colleagues argued Thursday that spending should be expanded to the levels proposed by the White House when it presented a six-year, $478 billion transportation plan last month.

That would increase spending by about $25 billion a year. The bills that House and Senate Republicans have been working on this year are expected to keep funding near the current level of about $50 billion.

“Flat funding is unacceptable,” Schumer said. “If we fail to adopt the president’s numbers, states will be left in a hole. Finding the money to pay for this isn’t going to be easy, but it is essential.”

Pressed on where the cash might come from, Schumer said, “We have ideas, but it takes two to tango.”

That issue that has mired transportation spending for years is, on its face, bipartisan. The federal gas tax isn’t producing enough cash to pay the bills. The federal Highway Trust Fund has been bolstered by transfers from the general fund — $11 billion worth for the current extension — and Congress will have to come up with more cash to pay for another extension.

For a long-term bill of five or six years to emerge, Congress must solve the perpetual mystery of where the money will materialize. The options have long been spelled out, but there is no consensus — even within each of the two parties. Among them: increase the gas tax and let it keep pace with inflation, accept that general tax revenue should be part of the mix, expand highway tolling, or tax drivers by the number of miles they travel.

It has been estimated that it will take about $100 billion in new revenue to fund a six-year bill.

Read more:

House GOP turns table on Senate transportation bill

Can a new Congress bail out transportation in five months?

Plan to shift transportation burden to states seems doomed

White House sends Congress $478 billion, 6-year transportation bill

Officials use decrepit bridges, highways to make their point