Zinke said during the interview that an overabundance of fuel load — things such as twigs and leaves that make it possible for fires to burn — make fires more intense.
"There have been a number of instances where environmental groups have submitted petitions to the Bureau of Land Management, halting companies from removing dead and dying timber until the BLM can sort through each petition point,” Department of the Interior spokesman Faith C. Vander Voort said in an email. “These actions halt proper forest management and leave the West vulnerable to incredible devastation."
But Monica Turner, an ecologist at the University of Wisconsin at Madison, said this argument doesn't address the bigger problem.
“Making minor changes in the fuels [which] you then have to do repeatedly for many years is not going to solve the bigger problem of having to face climate change,” she told The Washington Post. “We cannot clear or thin our way out of this problem.”
While the devastation has gotten significantly worse, people living in the wildland-urban interface — communities next to natural areas — make the severity of the fires more palpable.
“While these fires are a tragedy, it’s also an opportunity to rethink our fire policies on a broader level as well as how and where we build our homes,” Yana Valachovic, a forest management expert, told The Post.
Many took issue with Zinke’s refusal to acknowledge that climate change is a major factor in the California wildfires.
“This has nothing to do with climate change,” Zinke told NBC affiliate KCRA this month. “This has to do with active forest management.”
Research shows that human-caused climate change is a primary factor behind the recent increase in fire severity. A 2016 study published in the Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences found that the heat and drought brought about by climate change was responsible for doubling the amount of land burned in the western United States between 1984 and 2015.
“There is a broad effort to deny the science of climate change and its links to the horrible wildfires in California, and it’s just not accurate,” Leah C. Stokes, professor of environmental and political science at the University of California at Santa Barbara, told The Post. “I don’t think the scale of reducing fuel load is a realistic policy proposal that would magically stop all fires in the western United States. Forests burn, and it is going to get a lot worse unless we do something about climate change.”
Environmental groups also took issue with the labeling of “terrorist."
“Zinke’s inability to understand basic fire science is leading him to turn to dangerous and inflammatory quips,” said Athan Manuel, director of the Lands Protection Program at the Sierra Club. “We do think we need to do sensible forest management. But this should be driven by science and practicality. This does not seem be a priority for the secretary.”
President Trump was was criticized last week for tweeting that “bad environmental laws” magnified the fires.
Trump's claim was quickly debunked by experts on Twitter.
“California’s forests are burning because of past severe drought and current extreme temperatures and weather, worsened by human-caused
#climatechange, which you think, in your fantasy world, doesn’t exist,” tweeted Peter Gleick, a scientist and co-founder of the Pacific Institute.
“Oh, and one last thing,” Gleick added. “
#Water in California rivers isn’t being “diverted” into the Pacific. It all used to flow there. What little #cawater reaches the sea now is all that’s left after farms and cities have diverted most of it out of rivers.”
Sarah Kaplan contributed to this report.