The Washington Post

Federal managers tell Congress budget cuts will hurt DOD’s mission and federal workers


Curtis Titus is a 20-year Army vet, married to a flower-shop owner, and he’s a good Texas Republican.

He’s also a federal civil servant who doesn’t like what his conservative member of Congress has planned for the workforce. So Titus, with other members of the Federal Managers Association (FMA), went to Capitol Hill on Wednesday to tell Rep. Blake Farenthold (R-Tex.), and others, to stop messing with federal employees.

Joe Davidson writes the Federal Diary, a column about federal government and workplace issues that celebrated its 80th birthday in November 2012. Davidson previously was an assistant city editor at The Washington Post and a Washington and foreign correspondent with The Wall Street Journal, where he covered federal agencies and political campaigns. View Archive

Titus, a manager at the Corpus Christi Army Depot, said that he voted for Farenthold but that he’s not sure he’d do it again. The second-term congressman, who chairs the House subcommittee on the federal workforce, co-sponsored a bill, approved by the House last month, that would extend the 27-month freeze on basic federal pay rates through the end of 2013.

Now, as if to welcome the federal managers to town, the House approved the extended freeze again Wednesday as part of a temporary funding measure. The extended freeze would be in addition to across-the-board budget cuts, known as sequestration, that could cut up to 20 percent of federal employees’ pay from April through September.

It’s enough to make people like Michael Frye consider retirement. This FMA member, who works at Edwards Air Force Base in California, has been on Uncle Sam’s payroll for 42 years. He knows of others whose retirement was hastened by the pay freeze.

“We’re sick and tired of being the group that continues to get bashed,” Titus said his FMA delegation told Farenthold.

Titus was pleased to learn about legislation Farenthold introduced Wednesday to keep federal workers from being furloughed because of the budget cuts that began being implemented this month.

“Our federal workforce needs to be operating at 100%,” Farenthold said in a statement.

Like others attending the FMA’s 75th national convention, Titus and Frye spoke in their roles as FMA representatives and not as Defense Department staffers. But it is his life as a DOD employee that has Titus upset with the inability of Congress to reach an agreement to avoid sequestration and measures, largely GOP-sponsored, that continue to target his pay.

“We’re absolutely sick and tired of the finger-pointing and being the pawns in the middle of this standoff,” Titus said.

In addition to costing workers pay, Titus and others said, furloughs would hurt the mission of the department and the entire government.

Forced days off means less work will be done and “that’s going to have a major impact on readiness,” said FMA Vice President George J. Smith, who works at the Naval Aviation Depot in Jacksonville, Fla. “My major concern is we are going to be letting down our national defense.”

Dora Quinlan, an FMA regional director who also is a manager in Jacksonville, said her employees “are most concerned about the agency’s mission, because we do support the war fighter.”

Security clearances are a must for national security workers. Defense Department managers are hearing from staffers worried about the impact furloughs could have on their clearances.

“There are folks who have lost their clearance because of debt-to-earning ratio,” Smith said.

Security clearances are reviewed periodically. Employees not considered financially stable can lose theirs. It’s not that a poor credit rating or being in debt makes someone less trustworthy, but the government, rightly or not, believes that an employee with bad finances could be a target for people offering bribes in exchange for classified information.

“If they don’t have a security clearance,” Smith said, “I can’t let them on the base.”

Smith and Quinlan, like others in Jacksonville and all around the government, are married to federal employees. That means unpaid days would hit two incomes in the house.

“We’ll just be eating at home a lot more,” Quinlan said. “We do tend to eat out often.” She and her husband also like to take a nice vacation every year. “We know we cannot do that this year.”

Others on her staff worry about more basic expenses — mortgages, college tuition, child care.

“They are saying,” she added, “‘enough is enough and stop trying to solve the deficit on the backs of employees.’”

“These are dedicated public servants, and they are really feeling beat down.”

Previous columns by Joe Davidson are available at

The Freddie Gray case

Please provide a valid email address.

You’re all set!

Campaign 2016 Email Updates

Please provide a valid email address.

You’re all set!

Get Zika news by email

Please provide a valid email address.

You’re all set!
Show Comments

Sign up for email updates from the "Confronting the Caliphate" series.

You have signed up for the "Confronting the Caliphate" series.

Thank you for signing up
You'll receive e-mail when new stories are published in this series.
Most Read


Success! Check your inbox for details.

See all newsletters

Close video player
Now Playing

To keep reading, please enter your email address.

You’ll also receive from The Washington Post:
  • A free 6-week digital subscription
  • Our daily newsletter in your inbox

Please enter a valid email address

I have read and agree to the Terms of Service and Privacy Policy.

Please indicate agreement.

Thank you.

Check your inbox. We’ve sent an email explaining how to set up an account and activate your free digital subscription.