The U.S. government agreed to a police request to restrict more than 37 square miles of airspace surrounding Ferguson, Mo., for 12 days in August for safety, but audio recordings show that local authorities privately acknowledged the purpose was to keep away news helicopters during ­violent street protests.

On Aug. 12, the morning after the Federal Aviation Administration imposed the first flight restriction, FAA air traffic managers struggled to redefine the flight ban to let commercial flights operate at nearby Lambert-St. Louis International Airport and police helicopters fly through the area — but restrict others.

“They finally admitted it really was to keep the media out,” an FAA manager said of the St. Louis County Police in a series of recorded telephone conversations obtained by the Associated Press. “But they were a little concerned of, obviously, anything else that could be going on.”

At another point, a manager at the FAA’s Kansas City center said police “did not care if you ran commercial traffic through this TFR [temporary flight restriction] all day long. They didn’t want media in there.”

FAA procedures for defining a no-fly area did not have an option that would accommodate that.

In this Aug. 18 file photo, people stand near a cloud of tear gas in Ferguson, Mo., during protests after the Aug. 9 shooting of unarmed black 18-year-old Michael Brown by a white police officer. (Jeff Roberson/AP)

“There is really . . . no option for a TFR that says, you know, ‘Okay, everybody but the media is okay,’ ” he said. The managers then worked out wording they thought would keep news helicopters out of the controlled zone but not impede other air traffic.

The conversations contradict claims by the St. Louis County Police Department, which responded to demonstrations after the fatal shooting of Michael Brown, 18, that the restriction was solely for safety and had nothing to do with preventing reporters from witnessing the violence or the police response.

Police said at the time, and again as recently as late Friday to the Associated Press, that they requested the flight restriction in response to shots fired at a police helicopter.

But police officials confirmed there was no damage to their helicopter and were unable to provide an incident report on the shooting. On the tapes, an FAA manager described the helicopter shooting as unconfirmed ­“rumors.”

The Associated Press obtained the recordings under the Freedom of Information Act.

“Any evidence that a no-fly zone was put in place as a pretext to exclude the media from covering events in Ferguson is extraordinarily troubling and a blatant violation of the press’s First Amendment rights,” said Lee Rowland, an American Civil Liberties Union staff lawyer who specializes in First Amendment issues.

FAA Administrator Michael Huerta said in a statement Sunday that his agency will always err on the side of safety. “FAA cannot and will never exclusively ban media from covering an event of national significance, and media was never banned from covering the ongoing events in Ferguson in this case.”

— Associated Press