Before being deployed overseas for the Iraq War in 2003, Army reservist Don Morrison filled out forms that gave instructions about where to send his body and possessions if he were killed.
“I thought, ‘Wow, this is mortality right in your face,’ ” Morrison, now 70, recalled.
With his attention focused on the possibility that things might end badly, Morrison asked his lawyer to draw up an advance directive describing what medical care he did and did not want if he were unable to make his own decisions.
One document, typically called a living will, spelled out Morrison’s preferences for life-sustaining medical treatment, such as ventilators and feeding tubes. The other, called a health-care proxy or health-care power of attorney, named a friend to make treatment decisions for him if he were to become incapacitated.
People with chronic illnesses were only slightly more likely than healthy individuals to document their wishes.
For the analysis, published in the July issue of Health Affairs, researchers reviewed 150 studies that reported on the proportion of adults who completed advance directives.
Of nearly 800,000 people in the studies, 36.7 percent had completed some kind of advance directive, including living wills and health-care proxies.
People older than 65 were significantly more likely to have completed any type of advance directive than younger ones, 45.6 percent vs. 31.6 percent. But the difference between people who were healthy and those who were sick was much smaller: 32.7 percent vs. 38.2 percent.
The Medicare program began reimbursing physicians in 2016 for counseling beneficiaries about advance-care planning. The Health Affairs study doesn’t incorporate any data that might be affected by that change.
There are many reasons that people are reluctant to sign a living will. State forms vary, but they generally ask people to spell out what medical intervention they want under various circumstances.
“Many people don’t sign advance directives because they worry they’re not going to get any care if they say they don’t want” cardiopulmonary resuscitation, said the study’s senior author, Katherine Courtright, an instructor of medicine in pulmonary and critical care at the University of Pennsylvania. “It becomes this very scary document that says, ‘Let me die.’ ”
Living wills are a snapshot at a point in time and don’t account for the fact that people’s wishes may change, said Diane Meier, a geriatrician and the director of the New York-based Center to Advance Palliative Care.
“In some ways, the public’s lack of excitement about this is related to the reality that it’s very hard to make decisions about the kind of care you want in the future when you don’t know what that will be like,” Meier said.
Sometimes as patients age and develop medical problems, they’re more willing to undergo treatments they might have rejected when they were younger and healthier, Meier said.
“People generally want to live as well as they can for as long as they can,” Meier said. If that means going on a ventilator for a few days to get over a bout of pneumonia, for example, many may want to do that.
But if their living will says they don’t want to be put on a ventilator, medical staff may feel bound to honor their wishes. Or not. Although living wills are legal documents, medical staff and family members or loved ones can reinterpret them.
“At the moment, I’m very healthy,” Morrison said. If he were to become ill or have a serious accident, he said, he’d want to weigh lifesaving interventions against the quality of life he could expect afterward. “If it were an end-of-life scenario, I don’t want to be resuscitated,” he said.
If someone’s wishes change, the documents can be changed. There’s no need to involve a lawyer in creating or revising advance directives, but they generally must be witnessed and may have to be notarized.
Although living wills can be tricky, experts have no reservations about recommending that people have a health-care proxy. Some even suggest, for example, that naming someone for that role should be a routine task that’s part of applying for a driver’s license.
“Treatment directives of any kind all assume we can anticipate the future with accuracy,” Meier said. “I think that’s an illusion. What needs to happen is a recognition that decisions need to be made in real time and in context.”
That’s where the health-care proxy comes in. Just naming someone isn’t enough, though. To be effective, people need to have conversations with their proxy and other loved ones to talk about their values and what matters to them at the end of life.
They may tell their health-care proxy that they want to die at home, for example, or that being mobile or able to communicate with their family is very important, said Jon Radulovic, a vice president at the National Hospice and Palliative Care Organization.
Some may opt to forgo painful interventions to extend their lives in favor of care that keeps them comfortable and maintains the best quality of life for the time that remains.
“The most important thing is to have the conversation with the people that you love around the kitchen table, and to have it early,” said Ellen Goodman, a Pulitzer Prize-winning writer who founded the Conversation Project, which provides tools to help people have conversations about end-of-life issues.
Morrison said he has talked with his health-care proxy about his wishes. The conversation wasn’t difficult, he said. Rather than spell out precisely what he wants done under what circumstances, Morrison is leaving most of the decisions to the proxy, if he can’t make his own choices.
Morrison said he’s glad he has put his wishes down on paper. “I think that’s very important to have,” he said. “It may not be a disease that I get, it may be a terrible accident. And that’s when [not knowing someone’s wishes] becomes a crisis.”
This column is produced by Kaiser Health News, an editorially independent news service that is a program of the Kaiser Family Foundation.