The Washington Post

Experts warn of dangers of overdiagnosis and treatment of cancer

Improved screening has resulted in the overdiagnosis and overtreatment of cancers that are not life-threatening, without significantly reducing the death rate from the disease, and the time has come to alter how cancer is detected, treated and defined, a panel of medical experts said Monday.

“Screening and patient awareness have increased the chance of identifying a spectrum of cancers, some of which are not life threatening,” a working group of the National Cancer Institute wrote in a commentary in the online version of the Journal of the American Medical Association. “Policies that prevent or reduce the chances of overdiagnosis and avoid overtreatment are needed, while maintaining those gains by which early detection is a major contributor to decreasing mortality.”

The opinion was published on the same day as an influential recommendation from the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force that called for annual CT scanning for lung cancer for high-risk patients — older heavy smokers and former smokers.

Laura J. Esserman, co-chair of the committee and director of the Breast Care Center at the University of California at San Francisco, said the messages of the two papers dovetail: Additional screening should be reserved for high-risk groups, and not every finding must result in action.

“More is not always better,” she said. “It’s pretty clear that cancer — the word now refers to a wide range of conditions, some of which will not progress and will not kill you. . . . We have to be a little bit more savvy.”

Breast and prostate cancers are prime examples, said Otis Brawley, chief medical officer of the American Cancer Society. “Looking at the epidemiology, a third of women have localized breast cancers that look like cancer but are never going to kill them,” he said. Yet a diagnosis that contains the word ‘cancer’ often causes so much anxiety for the patient and pressure on a physician to act that many women unnecessarily undergo radiation treatment or mastectomies, he said.

“We cure these women who have these localized tumors, but they didn’t need to be cured,” Brawley said.“That’s a hard concept for even doctors to understand now.”

On the other hand, the committee noted, early detection and removal of precancerous colon and cervical lesions has reduced the incidence of those cancers.

The committee recommended changing the names of some conditions and reserving the term “cancer” for lesions “with a reasonable likelihood of lethal progression if left untreated.”

For example, it suggested that “ductal carcinoma in situ,” the presence of abnormal cells in the milk duct of the breast, is not invasive and should not be labeled a cancer.

“Right now, we have women getting bilateral mastectomies for ductal carcinoma in situ, which is not a cancer,” Brawley said. “It’s the world turned upside down.”

Lenny Bernstein covers health and medicine. He started as an editor on the Post’s National Desk in 2000 and has worked in Metro and Sports.



Success! Check your inbox for details. You might also like:

Please enter a valid email address

See all newsletters

Show Comments

Sign up for email updates from the "Confronting the Caliphate" series.

You have signed up for the "Confronting the Caliphate" series.

Thank you for signing up
You'll receive e-mail when new stories are published in this series.
Most Read



Success! Check your inbox for details.

See all newsletters

Your Three. Videos curated for you.
Play Videos
What can babies teach students?
Unconventional warfare with a side of ale
A veteran finds healing on a dog sled
Play Videos
A fighter pilot helmet with 360 degrees of sky
Is fencing the answer to brain health?
Scenes from Brazil's Carajás Railway
Play Videos
How a hacker group came to Washington
The woman behind the Nats’ presidents ‘Star Wars’ makeover
How hackers can control your car from miles away
Play Videos
Philadelphia's real signature sandwich
Full disclosure: 3 bedrooms, 2 baths, 1 ghoul
Europe's migrant crisis, explained

To keep reading, please enter your email address.

You’ll also receive from The Washington Post:
  • A free 6-week digital subscription
  • Our daily newsletter in your inbox

Please enter a valid email address

I have read and agree to the Terms of Service and Privacy Policy.

Please indicate agreement.

Thank you.

Check your inbox. We’ve sent an email explaining how to set up an account and activate your free digital subscription.