FILE - This Jan. 26, 2017 file photo shows containers of Roundup, a weed killer made by Monsanto, on a shelf at a hardware store in Los Angeles. A San Francisco jury’s $289 million verdict in favor of a school groundskeeper who says Roundup weed killer caused his cancer will face its first court test. Agribusiness giant Monsanto will argue at a hearing on Wednesday, Oct. 10, 2018 that Judge Suzanne Bolanos should throw out the verdict in favor of DeWayne Johnson. (Reed Saxon, File/Associated Press)

SAN FRANCISCO — The Latest on $289 million verdict against Monsanto (all times local):

4:50 p.m.

A judge is still deciding on whether to uphold a jury’s $289 million judgment against agribusiness giant Monsanto.

San Francisco Superior Court Judge Suzanne Bolanos ended a two-hour hearing without making a formal ruling. Earlier in the day, she issued a tentative ruling saying she intended to toss out the jury’s $250 million punitive damage award and schedule a new trial on that issue. The judge also suggested she may reduce the rest of the award by $31 million if she upholds the jury’s decision that Monsanto’s weed-killer caused DeWayne Johnson’s cancer.

The judge ordered lawyers to submit written legal arguments by Friday and will formally rule later.

A jury in August awarded Johnson $39 million in compensatory damages and $250 million in punitive damages.

___

4 p.m.

A judge said a cancer patient’s lawyer misled the jury and used improper hyperbole comparing Monsanto to tobacco companies during his closing arguments.

Lawyers for both sides are arguing in court Wednesday whether the improper arguments entitled Monsanto to a new trial.

Monsanto’s attorney George Lombardi argued for a new trial, saying the comparing Monsanto to the tobacco industry was intentional and inaccurate. Tobbaco companies agreed to pay billions of dollars to settle lawsuits alleging smoking caused cancer. Johnson’s attorney Michael Miller argued that the judge properly instructed the jury to disregard the comparison and to throw out their verdict because of the argument is too severe of a punishment.

The judge is deciding whether to toss out the jury’s verdict order a new trial.

___

1:55 p.m.

In a tentative ruling, a San Francisco judge says she will order a new trial in a $289 million judgment against agribusiness giant Monsanto brought by a groundskeeper who says Roundup weed-killer caused his cancer.

San Francisco Superior Court Judge Suzanne Bolanos issued the ruling Wednesday ahead of scheduled oral arguments.

She said plaintiff DeWayne Johnson failed to produce “clear and convincing evidence of malice or oppression” by Monsanto. She wrote that he did not provide any evidence that Monsanto employees believed that exposure to the product caused his lymphoma.

The jury in August awarded Johnson $39 million in compensatory damages and $250 million in punitive damages.

___

10:05 a.m.

A San Francisco jury’s $289 million verdict in favor of a school groundskeeper who says Roundup weed killer caused his cancer will face its first court test.

Agribusiness giant Monsanto will argue at a hearing on Wednesday that Judge Suzanne Bolanos should throw out the verdict in favor of DeWayne Johnson. Attorneys for the company say Johnson failed to prove that Roundup or similar herbicides caused his lymphoma and presented no evidence that Monsanto executives were malicious in marketing Roundup. Bolanos was not expected to rule immediately.

Johnson’s attorneys responded in court documents that the jury was attentive and well-educated and reached a reasonable verdict.

The jury in August awarded Johnson $39 million in compensatory damages and $250 million in punitive damages.

Copyright 2018 The Associated Press. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.