(BIGSTOCK)

By many measures, Hawaii is one of the healthiest states in the union. Yet only Mississippi has a higher rate of flu or pneumonia deaths than the Aloha State.

West Virginia, usually among the bottom dwellers in state health rankings, is in the middle of the pack for deaths related to Alzheimer’s disease.

Similarly, relatively unhealthy Arkansas has a low rate of drug overdose deaths while Connecticut, which ranks near the top in overall health, has one of the country’s highest rates of death linked to drug use.

Health disparities based on race, income and gender tend to draw more notice, but variations related to where people live are prompting public health officials to use the information to craft more-targeted policies. As the data becomes more precise, experts believe interventions to combat geographic disparities will become more effective.

Location and health

The increasing interest comes amid a growing recognition that people’s health depends as much on factors related to location — such as recreational opportunities, transportation, crime and unemployment — as it does on what takes place in doctor’s offices or hospitals.

“In many ways, your Zip code is more important than your genetic code when it comes to health,” said Jay Butler, Alaska’s chief medical officer and its director of public health.

The truth of that observation is evident in a single comparison from a recent report from the Center on Society and Health at Virginia Commonwealth University and the Urban Institute: On average, a newborn in Mississippi will live to age 75. One born in Hawaii will make it beyond 81.

The VCU center and the Urban Institute recently released the first of nine reports examining the states according to 39 health outcomes, including heart disease mortality, cancer mortality and suicide. The project also seeks to correlate those outcomes with 123 social and economic factors such as government spending, proficiency in reading and rates of incarceration. (The report doesn’t offer explanations for the correlations.)

For example, the report finds a strong correlation between lower spending on public transportation and higher instances of car accidents, and between adult obesity and deaths related to pneumonia. It also links a shortage of primary-care services to higher rates of deaths related to diabetes, heart disease, stroke and pneumonia and to shorter life expectancy.

Others have also compared geographic locations by various health measures. For example, the University of Wisconsin Population Health Institute does health rankings of counties in every state. A collaboration between the University of Southern California and PolicyLink, a nonprofit focused on issues of equity, compared the health of 150 metropolitan areas using several indicators, including rates of asthma, diabetes and obesity.

Even smaller geographic comparisons are coming. Later this year, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention and the Robert Wood Johnson Foundation plan to unveil health data from the country’s largest 500 cities broken down by census tract or neighborhood. The goal, according to the CDC, is to help cities and local health departments “better understand the geographic distribution of health-related variables” to “help them plan public health interventions.”

In many places, health interventions based on geographic data are already happening. Steve Woolf, director of the VCU center, said that in many states, tobacco control policies and cigarette taxes “are the direct result of health-disparities information related to smoking.” Woolf also noted that traffic fatalities have informed state decisions on motorcycle helmets, car-seat restraints and speed limits.

Maryland tackled diabetes in the southern part of the state by linking more patients to primary-care doctors, and it improved behavioral health on the Eastern Shore by creating mental health crisis services, said Joshua Sharfstein, who led the Maryland Department of Health and Mental Hygiene from 2011 to 2014.

Local and state health officials also have made changes to help reduce childhood asthma, including coordinating communication between school-based nurses and primary-care practices and enabling students to administer their own inhalers rather than relying on school nurses. Sharfstein said statewide efforts also lowered Maryland’s relatively high infant mortality rate. The state improved access to health care for expectant mothers and launched educational campaigns to teach parents about safe sleeping practices for newborns.

“Knowing how you compare to other states is very helpful,” said Sharfstein, a physician who is now an associate dean at the Johns Hopkins University Bloomberg School of Public Health.

In Colorado, public health officials several years ago discovered that high blood pressure was much more prevalent in the two sparsely populated frontier counties of Las Animas and Huerfano. The statewide rate was 26 percent, compared with 38 and 39 percent in the two counties.

Kelly Means, clinical quality improvement manager in the state’s Department of Public Health and Environment, said that finding led to a program to identify residents in the two counties who had high blood pressure but were not getting treatment and to refer them to primary-care doctors. The state also encouraged those doctors to direct hypertensive patients to community programs that encouraged healthy eating, exercise and smoking cessation.

Means said that the program has linked 75 previously undiagnosed residents to primary care and 82 already identified patients to activities to reduce hypertension. One participating primary-care practice reported that the number of patients who have their blood pressure under control has increased by 20 percent.

In Alaska, Butler said, geographic health data led to targeted antismoking and suicide prevention programs in northern and western parts of the state, where the rates of lung cancer and suicide are particularly high.

In Connecticut, the data indicated a high rate of asthma-related hospitalizations in the city of Waterbury, said Mehul Dalal, the chronic-disease director in the state Department of Public Health. That finding prompted the state to help Waterbury develop a home inspection program in which health workers identify environmental conditions that can trigger asthma and advise residents on how to remove them.

States act

Kalamazoo, Mich., now sends nurses into homes to combat the city’s high rate of infant mortality. Philadelphia, alarmed over its high obesity numbers, this year enacted a soda tax. In Utah, the health department recently began promoting gun safety in response to the state’s high suicide rate.

But health-policy analysts, even those who do geographic analyses, caution that geographic data isn’t perfect. Laudan Aron, a senior fellow at the Urban Institute who helped produce the report with the VCU center, said that problems in data collection, such as poor reporting practices by medical providers, can skew the numbers. That’s why comparative findings should be viewed only as a first step to more investigation, she said.

And some findings, while interesting, may not point the way to action that can make a difference. The VCU-Urban Institute report, for instance, ranks states by their rates of mortality associated with Alzheimer’s disease. Washington ranks last in that category, but there is probably nothing the state can do about it. “Unfortunately, at this point, there are no evidence-based practices we know of that reduce the rate of Alzheimer’s,” Woolf said.

If nothing else, policymakers say, such comparisons prompt discussions across borders to learn best practices in addressing particular health problems. And as Maryland’s Sharfstein said, in health policy, a little competitive rivalry between geographic areas can only benefit patients.

Stateline