The Washington Post

What’s in Susan Rice’s future?

President Barack Obama meets with former President Bill Clinton and U.S. Permanent Representative to the United Nations Susan Rice in New York, N.Y., March 29, 2011. (Pete Souza/THE WHITE HOUSE)

The decision by United Nations ambassador Susan Rice to withdraw her name from consideration as President Obama’s next Secretary of State sent shockwaves through Washington Thursday evening.

Rice, as anyone watching the political battle over her potential nomination knows by now, had come under fire from Senate Republicans for comments she made earlier this fall on Sunday morning talk shows about the attacks in Benghazi, Libya. Sens. John McCain, Lindsey Graham and Kelly Ayotte seized on the issue and promised a difficult confirmation for Rice to the job of chief diplomat. In the aftermath, Rice chose to withdraw her name, saying in a letter to the president that “I am now convinced that the confirmation process would be lengthy disruptive and costly—to you and to our most pressing national and international priorities.”

For now, it appears, Rice will remain in her job as the ambassador to the United Nations. She wrote in an op-ed in the Post that she has “a great job” and that she will “continue the work of the American people at the United Nations.” Though her name has been floated for the position of national security adviser, administration officials have said in reports that Thomas E. Donilon is expected to stay in that job. The president said in a statement, “I have every confidence that Susan has limitless capability to serve our country now and in the years to come.”

As he should. As disappointing as it may be for Obama and many of Rice’s supporters not to see her nominated to Secretary of State, the president had a chance to learn a lot that could fuel his thinking for future posts. It is not every day that a leader gets such a stark reading of one of his key deputies’ priorities: country over career. Not to mention her loyalty.

President Obama may be angry over how the situation played out. Women within the administration—and for all I know, Rice herself—could be quietly seething that she didn’t have the opportunity to reach her field’s highest post. (ComPost imagines the message behind Rice’s diplomatic letter in a hilarious send-up.) There may be few consolation prizes in political careers, and the job of Secretary of State is unlikely to come up again. But I’d guess that what the president has learned about Susan Rice in the last few days means this is hardly the end of the road for her career.

Jena McGregor is a columnist for the Washington Post’s On Leadership section.

More from On Leadership:

The best and worst places to work in government

Would women have been better at solving the fiscal cliff?

Great leadership books in 2012

Like On Leadership? Follow us on Facebook and Twitter:

@post_lead | @jenamcgregor | @lily_cunningham

Jena McGregor writes a daily column analyzing leadership in the news for the Washington Post’s On Leadership section.



Success! Check your inbox for details. You might also like:

Please enter a valid email address

See all newsletters

Show Comments

Sign up for email updates from the "Confronting the Caliphate" series.

You have signed up for the "Confronting the Caliphate" series.

Thank you for signing up
You'll receive e-mail when new stories are published in this series.
Most Read



Success! Check your inbox for details.

See all newsletters

Your Three. Video curated for you.

To keep reading, please enter your email address.

You’ll also receive from The Washington Post:
  • A free 6-week digital subscription
  • Our daily newsletter in your inbox

Please enter a valid email address

I have read and agree to the Terms of Service and Privacy Policy.

Please indicate agreement.

Thank you.

Check your inbox. We’ve sent an email explaining how to set up an account and activate your free digital subscription.