The researchers’ work wasn’t just whimsy, and it wasn’t actually an endorsement of ordering a wallaby from a shady online exotic pet dealer. It was in response to a Dutch national animal welfare policy that took effect in 2013 to address a growing trend in the Netherlands of owning exotic pets.
The policy said people could own “production animals,” a category that includes pigs and gerbils, or pets that are “suitable” for keeping by anyone without special knowledge or skills. The study’s goal was to use statistical methods to determine in an “objective and nondiscriminatory” way what animals should qualify for that second category.
The scientists who took on this task, led by Paul Koene at the Wageningen University and Research center, were specialists in animal ecology, ethology, veterinary science and husbandry. After gathering information on animals kept as pets in the Netherlands and eliminating production animals and dogs and cats from their pool, they had 90 mammals to judge.
They then came up with short summaries — “oneliners” — on each animal for each of 24 behavior and needs criteria, including their food, shelter and reproductive needs, as well as their risk to humans and other animals. Two other teams of scientists reviewed those summaries and ranked the animals for pet suitability.
It should be noted that none of the mammals on the list of 90 — which included the bactrian camel and a several small animals like voles and gerbils — got a pass from all the scientists on the team that did the ranking. But somehow, a couple of wallabies and a deer got a majority vote. (The study, published in Frontiers in Veterinary Science, did include the caveat that assessors’ judgments might be influenced by an animal’s ugliness or cuteness.)
Koene, for the record, said in a statement that he does not expect the list-toppers to be seen walking around the Netherlands on leashes anytime soon. “Dogs and cats are a special kind of pets,” he said, adding: “Wallabies will certainly not replace them.”