On Tuesday night, Hillary Clinton made history when she officially became the first woman to ever top a major party's presidential ticket.

On Wednesday morning, a slew of major newspapers announced this historic nomination in bold headlines, alongside photographs of … Bill Clinton.

This did not go unnoticed, and plenty of people — journalists and non-journalists alike — took to social media to make it clear that they were dumbfounded and outraged.

The list of offending papers included The Wall Street Journal:

The Chicago Tribune:

The Houston Chronicle:

The Alaska Dispatch News, The San Francisco Chronicle and The Arizona Republic:

And, yes, The Washington Post:

So how to explain this? Well, Hillary Clinton was not actually physically present onstage — though she did appear via live video, very late in the evening. But a live video screen doesn't make for a great photo opportunity. And Bill Clinton's speech was clearly the big moment of the night.

AD
AD

Still, those arguments are not likely to satisfy those who can't fathom how, after a woman makes American history, her husband is the one featured on front pages across the country. Especially considering that some prominent publications managed to find an alternative: The New York Times featured a photo of women cheering and hoisting a victorious sign with the words "GIRL POWER," and other newspapers settled for the less-than-ideal photo of Hillary on the Jumbotron, or published archival images of the Democratic nominee.

In its later editions, The Wall Street Journal swapped its front-page photo of Bill Clinton for an image of Hillary Clinton on-screen.

AD
AD