“I don’t want to hurt Facebook. I don’t want to regulate them half to death. But we have a problem. Our promised digital utopia has minefields in it…. But my biggest worry with all of this is that the privacy issue and what I call the propagandist issue are both too big for Facebook to fix, and that’s the frightening part,” Kennedy said Sunday on CBS’s “Face the Nation.”
Zuckerberg, who for years has resisted calls to testify before Congress, is likely to face tough questions from lawmakers over two days of congressional hearings at the Capitol. Kennedy, for one, said he has “many, many questions,” including whether users should be able to “erase” their digital footprint on Facebook and whether they should have more control over the data that Facebook collects about them.
“Is it fair for me to give up all of my personal data to Facebook and apparently everybody else in the Western Hemisphere in exchange for me being able to see what some of my high school buddies had for dinner Saturday night? Who, who owns my data? Do I own it, or does Facebook own it?” Kennedy said. “The service agreement with Facebook — it’s written in Swahili. Nobody understands it.”
Zuckerberg also is likely to be grilled about the role Facebook has played in spreading misinformation, especially in the last presidential election. In an effort to thwart Russia’s Internet trolls, who bought ads about socially divisive issues to sow chaos in the United States, Facebook announced recently that it will require buyers of political ads to verify their identity and location, and those who are unable to do so will be prohibited from running political ads on the platform.
“These steps by themselves won’t stop all people trying to game the system,” Zuckerberg said in a statement last week. “But they will make it a lot harder for anyone to do what the Russians did during the 2016 election and use fake accounts and pages to run ads.”
Kennedy said that the steps are a start but that they also raise another question that Zuckerberg must answer.
“Does he really know who’s running ads on his platform? He doesn’t … We need to talk about how we’re going to find out,” Kennedy said.
Other lawmakers have also said they want more specific answers from Zuckerberg about Cambridge Analytica and Facebook’s privacy practices.
“More than any one issue, I’m interested in Mark Zuckerberg’s vision for the responsibility Facebook plans to take for what happens on its platform, how it will protect users’ data, and how it intends to proactively stop harmful conduct instead of being forced to respond to it months or years later,” Sen. John Thune (R-S.D.), chairman of the Senate Commerce Committee, said in a statement, The Washington Post’s Tony Romm reported.
Romm further wrote:
Now, the stakes are sky high for Zuckerberg, whose every statement — probably under oath — will carry immense legal and political weight. His company is under investigation around the world, including a probe in the United States that threatens Facebook with record fines. And Zuckerberg’s testimony could fuel new efforts to regulate not only Facebook but also the entire tech industry, at a time when lawmakers increasingly are wondering whether Silicon Valley is out of control.
Kennedy said he doesn’t think Facebook should censor everything its users can see, but he wants the social media platform to combat the spread of fake news and hateful messages.
“I do want them to stop people from running advertisements on Facebook that encourages genocide of Rohingya Muslims in Burma,” Kennedy said. “These are deep issues. They’re not going to go away, and we’re not going to conclude this in one hearing, and I hope that Mr. Zuckerberg will be forthcoming and frank.”
Facebook has for weeks been dealing with the fallout over Cambridge Analytica, which Facebook suspended last month after learning that the data firm did not delete data it had inappropriately collected from users who downloaded a personality prediction app. A University of Cambridge psychologist gained access to the data of 270,000 Facebook users who downloaded the app — and then passed the information to Cambridge Analytica, a firm that profiles and targets potential voters.
Craig Timberg, Tony Romm and Elizabeth Dwoskin contributed to this article.