The campaign is odd on a couple of counts.
1) The World Meteorological Organization (WMO) has a pre-set list of names that it rotates every six years. It only adds a new name into the cycle on the rare occasion a storm is “retired.” For a storm to be retired, it must cause extreme damage and/or loss of life (e.g. Katrina and Sandy). So, in the next several years, there are likely to be just a few opportunities for any politicians’ names to be considered for the list!
Also, the WMO’s naming convention involves first names only. So the last names of politicians, which would identify them, are excluded by definition.
I realize the campaigners probably appreciate the WMO isn’t going to take them seriously, but it might be a more effective campaign if the stated goal was realistic.
2) While scientists generally agree the climate change will make hurricanes more intense in future decades, a definitive link between the strength of today’s storms and global warming has not been made.
I understand 350.org’s effort to cast light on politicians who make unscientific statements about climate change, but hurricanes – whose climate change connections are a bit foggy – aren’t the best poster children.
Here’s the campaign’s promotional video referred to above…
(On its face, the video is amusing in some ways, but it’s also over the top in directly implicating politicians in the impacts of hurricanes. Climate change is/will be a relatively small player in the toll of hurricanes on the coastline – compared to development/infrastructure.)