The Washington Post

Richmond earthquake “not likely” an aftershock from 2011 Virginia quake


The 3.2 magnitude earthquake that rattled Richmond and surrounding areas of the Mid-Atlantic last night (at 9:47 p.m.) was likely its own, new earthquake – not an aftershock of the much more powerful 5.8-magnitude earthquake that struck August 23, 2011 and damaged the Washington Monument.

Last night’s quake, its epicenter 32 miles west of Richmond or 8 miles southwest of Powhatan, lies in a different area of the central Virginia seismic zone from the 2011 quake, whose epicenter was in Mineral, Va.

“This is pretty far south of that plate [from the 2011 quake] – about 60 kilometers [37 miles] south: not likely an after shock,” said Paul Caruso, a geophysicist at the U.S. Geological Survey’s National Earthquake Information Center in Denver.

The USGS has received over 1,600 reports from witnesses who felt last night’s quake, but no damage has been reported.  Typically, it takes an earthquake of magnitude 5 or higher to cause damage.  Magnitude 3 earthquakes are associated with “weak” shaking.

While a minor quake, Capital Weather Gang readers felt shaking as far away as Arlington, Annapolis, and Potomac.  South of the epicenter, shaking was felt as far southwest as Lynchburg, according to USGS.

Areas where last night’s earthquake was felt. (USGS)


By comparison, the 2011 quake was felt “from central Georgia to central Maine and west to Detroit, Michigan and Chicago, Illinois,” writes USGS.

In addition to its much greater range, the 2011 quake was thousands of times more powerful than last night’s relatively minor tremor.

“Every time you go up 1 magnitude, there’s a 100 times more energy released,” said USGS’ Caruso.  “If you go from from 3.2 to 5.2, it’s 10,000 times the energy released.”

Sometimes when an earthquake strikes, it is a foreshock, portending a bigger tremor to come.

But Caruso doesn’t think there’s much to worry about. “We can’t predict the future, so no one can say,” he said. “But there’s very little likelihood of something bigger occurring.”

“Even if it was a foreshock, we wouldn’t expect anything significant [to follow], magnitude 6 or larger, say,” Caruso added.


Jason is the Washington Post’s weather editor and Capital Weather Gang's chief meteorologist. He earned a master's degree in atmospheric science, and spent 10 years as a climate change science analyst for the U.S. government. He holds the Digital Seal of Approval from the National Weather Association.
Show Comments
Most Read

At a Glance


52° /52°
Drop 100%


40° /50°
Drop 60%


43° /56°
Drop 70%


50° /55°
Drop 40%


37° /50°


33° /50°
National Airport

Right Now

Washington, D.C., Snow Tracker

Current Snow Total
Record Most Snow
Record Least Snow
(1997-98, 1972-73)
Last Winter's Snow Total

D.C. Area Almanac

Avg. High
Avg. Low
Rec. High
Rec. Low
Next Story
David Streit · May 22, 2014

To keep reading, please enter your email address.

You’ll also receive from The Washington Post:
  • A free 6-week digital subscription
  • Our daily newsletter in your inbox

Please enter a valid email address

I have read and agree to the Terms of Service and Privacy Policy.

Please indicate agreement.

Thank you.

Check your inbox. We’ve sent an email explaining how to set up an account and activate your free digital subscription.