“The editing on this was horrendous,” Cerveny told The Washington Post. “I was really upset when I saw this.”
Lots of other people are seeing it now, too. After the segment aired in the United Kingdom, the U.K.-based Sun newspaper published an article online with this headline:
Scientists claim 170 mph ‘air bombs’ capable of downing planes and ships could unlock mystery of notorious stretch of sea
Then the New York Post picked it up:
The mystery of the Bermuda triangle may finally be solved
You might not think the Sun or the New York Post are authorities on science, but they cite the Science Channel, which certainly sounds like it’s an authority, and the Science Channel (mis)cites Cerveny, who definitely is an authority.
Cerveny is not only the director of a university meteorology department, but — maybe more notably — he’s also the lead rapporteur on extreme records for the United Nations’ World Meteorological Organization. He has the final say on whether an extreme weather report is actually a world record.
“What on Earth? looks at strange images captured by satellite cameras,” said Steven Green, the COO of WAG TV, which produced the segment for the Science Channel. “Through our experts, each story explores a number of theories and speculates about different causes, before focusing on the most likely answer to the mystery.”
“Scientists believe the powerful winds reported by radar in the North Sea also exist below the hexagonal clouds over the Bahamas, and meteorologist Randy Cerveny thinks they’re connected to a terrifying atmospheric phenomenon,” the narrator says in the “What on Earth” segment.
“If Professor Cerveny is right, and these strange hexagons are the signature of deadly air bombs,” the segment continues, “then this satellite image could . . . solve the riddle of the Bermuda Triangle.”
Microbursts can do extensive damage on land and can definitely sink ships in the ocean. Could microbursts have sunk a few ships and downed a few planes in the Bermuda Triangle? Sure. Does this mean the Bermuda Triangle mystery is real and that we’ve solved it? No — Cerveny isn’t saying that.
He said he does segments for the show and typically “either you give the actual explanation, or the straw-man explanation,” so someone else can come in and knock it down. He said he offered the microburst explanation as a possibility to knock down. Instead, the segment offered it as a legitimate explanation.
Cerveny said he didn’t have an opportunity to see the show and correct it before it aired. “Nope. That was a surprise,” he said, laughing. “I did not know what was going on until I saw this. I have no interest in studying the Bermuda Triangle.”