In a Jan. 18 memo included in SIGAR’s report, Campbell wrote that he could not speak to why the information was available in the past, but decided to classify “sensitive operational information” that his staff deemed could be used against U.S. or Afghan troops.
“With lives literally on the line, I am sure that you can join me in recognizing that we must be careful to avoid providing sensitive information to those that threaten our forces and Afghan forces, particularly information that could be used by such opposing forces to sharpen their attacks,” Campbell wrote.
But the information that has been classified doesn’t all appear to threaten security, if released. Among the questions Campbell refused to have his command answer publicly is how $25 million authorized by Congress has been used to assist women in the Afghan army, what the definitions of “present for duty” and “unavailable” are, and what is the total amount of funding the United States has spent on salaries in the Afghan National Police.
Steven Aftergood, who directs a project on government secrecy for the Federation of American Scientists, wrote Thursday on his blog that Campbell’s classification of information is “startlingly indiscriminate.” The issue “highlights the inadequacy of existing mechanisms for correcting excessive, abusive or mistaken classification decisions,” he added.
Violence in Afghanistan remains high. There were about 60.1 daily “security incidents” — a term that includes firefights, improvised explosive device strikes and other attacks — between November 2013 and last November, SIGAR said. The Taliban and other insurgent groups still pose either a substantial or high threat in nearly all of the southern and eastern parts of the country, as this SIGAR map shows: