A recent Associated Press story is getting widespread attention: The U.S. Army Research Office is researching how elephants can sniff out explosives. The pachyderms wouldn’t be used in combat, but researchers hope to take what they learn and incorporate it into electronic sensors used by U.S. troops in the future.
It’s one of many times the U.S. military has used animals to assist in operations. Some of the examples are relatively novel, while others are controversial. Some examples:
The U.S. Navy has used dolphins in a variety of ways, including to detect underwater mines. The work is expected to be phased out eventually, with underwater drones eventually replacing them, Navy officials have said. The U.S. Navy Marine Mammal Program oversees their use, and says that a dolphins’ ability to use sonar makes them well-suited for the job.
The dolphins are not trained to attack other ships, in part because they cannot tell the difference between U.S. and enemy vessels. The porpoises can be trained to swim alongside boats, ride inside them or transported by plane and helicopter, Navy officials said.
The marine mammal program also has used sea lions because of their ability to find potential enemy swimmers near piers and ships and draw attention to them. In one case, the Navy developed the Shallow Water Intruder Detection System (SWIDS) program, using it overseas.
U.S. Army officials highlighted in 2012 their use of rats in the Rugged Automated Training System (RATS), which was developed to see how well the rodents could find bombs.
The use of rats could have several advantages, including that their small size would allow them to sneak into tiny spaces where larger animals and people cannot.
U.S. service members have used a variety of pack animals in remote areas, including mules and donkeys. The practice is especially common with elite Special Operations troops, who frequently operate in small groups away from support from larger units that would provide logistical support.
A Special Forces document published in 2007 and posted online by the Federation of American Scientists detailed how the animals should receive care.
“Mules are intelligent and possess a strong sense of self-preservation,” it said. “A packer cannot make a mule do something if the mule thinks it will get hurt, no matter how much persuasion is used… many people confuse this trait with stubbornness.”
The military has used pigs and goats in medical training for years, shooting them and then rushing to administer them medical aid so that troops are familiar with the unpredictability of providing combat care. The practice has been panned by People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals (PETA) and other organizations as inhumane, but the military has said it is vital to training.
The Pentagon acknowledged plans late last year to reduce how frequently it uses live animals, but will continue with combat trauma training.
Long before the use of drones, the military used pigeons to deliver messages and conduct overhead reconnaissance of battlefields. The practice was especially common during World War I and World War II, when the Army oversaw tens of thousands of birds taught at the Pigeon Breeding and Training Center at Fort Monmouth, N.J.
The Smithsonian maintains a Web page dedicated to Cher Ami, a World War I pigeon that flew messages over France.
This is probably the most obvious way, given the widespread use of canines during the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan. A recent book, “War Dogs: Tales of Canine Heroism, History and Love,” captures much of the practice, outlining how the use of dogs in the military has evolved over the years.