In an interview, Gen. Herbert “Hawk” Carlisle, the head of the Air Force’s Air Combat Command, said the jet fighter would likely be declared combat ready “at the leading edge” of a time frame that begins Aug. 1. Once that happens, he said “they are ready to go.” Still, he said the program remains in its developmental stages, and that officials have continued to find and fix problems. The plane still still due for upgrades in its software in addition to other changes.
“I’m very, very confident it is going to continue to exceed our expectations,” he said. Declaring the plane’s “initial combat capability is just the beginning. We still have work to do on the airplane, and it will continue to get better.”
For years, the $400 billion program suffered a series of problems, and the F-35 was derided as “the plane that ate the Pentagon.” In 2014, the engine of one of the jets caught fire as it was preparing to take off, forcing the Pentagon to temporarily ground the entire fleet.
But in more recent years the program has gotten back on track, Pentagon officials said. Production has begun to climb. Prices have come down. And it has hit a series of milestones, including its international debut at an airshow this summer in the United Kingdom.
Approximately 180 of the aircraft have been delivered by Bethesda-based Lockheed Martin, the world’s largest defense contractor. And the Pentagon plans to buy a total of 2,443 — though some in Congress, including Sen. John McCain (R-Ariz.), the chairman of the Armed Services Committee, has said there is no way the military will be able to afford that many.
Still, military officials say the so-called fifth-generation fighter is a significant step up from its predecessors, allowing pilots to maneuver undetected through enemy territory. The plane, which relies on so many lines of code it’s often referred to as a “flying computer,” has also been heralded for its ability to give pilots unparalleled situational awareness.
As the Air Force transitions from F-16s to the F-35, Lt. Col George Watkins, the commander of the 34th Fighter Squadron, said he has “been amazed at what we can do when going up against fourth-generation fighters” in training.
“They have no idea where we’re at,” he said in a call with reporters. “And that’s a pretty awesome feeling to know your pilots are in a unfair fight. That’s what we’re looking for.”
The jet comes in three variants. The Marine Corps’ can land vertically and take off on a short runway. The Navy version is capable of landing on aircraft carriers, while the Air Force’s is a more conventional fighter jet.
Last year, the Marine Corps declared that its variant was ready for combat. But the declaration from the Air Force would be much more significant because the service plans on buying 1,763 of the jets, more than any other of the services.
“It’s an endorsement that the program is back on track, and it really needs that,” said Richard Aboulafia, an aerospace analyst at the Teal Group, a Virginia-based consulting firm.
He also noted that the Air Force’s version, the F-35A, is the version of the jet that many foreign governments have chosen as well. “They are taking a lot of heat because of the problems with the program,” he said. “And this gives them political cover: ‘Hey it’s entered service in the U.S.’”
In recent testimony before Congress, Lt. Gen. Christopher Bogdan, the program’s executive director, said the fighter is “at a pivot point” as production is about to ramp up. He said while 45 aircraft were manufactured in 2015, that number should grow to more than 100 in 2018 and up to 145 by 2020.
Richard Meyer, the Air Force’s deputy chief of the F-35 System Management Office Division, said the aircraft that’s being certified will be able to perform many basic functions but will continue to evolve as time goes on.
“There are more improvements that are going to continue to modernize the airplane,” he said. “We’ll be able to get better weapons and better avionics, and make it better against an evolving threat. The enemy isn’t standing still.”
Contract negotiations between Lockheed Martin and the Pentagon on the next two batches of aircraft, a total of 147 jets, have dragged out for months. And during a recent earnings call, Bruce Tanner, Lockheed’s chief financial officer, said the company has had to spend nearly $1 billion of its own money to keep the line going.
“We will not be able to continue and have that level of cash outflow as a corporation. We simply don’t have that capacity,” he said. “The Pentagon clearly knows that situation, and I’m optimistic that we are going to get cash soon.”