Retired Army Col. Peter R. Mansoor, Petraeus’s former No. 2 officer, said that Meese is known as bright, talented and conscientious among his peers. In Afghanistan, he was in charge of alliance relations in the headquarters of the International Security Assistance Force in Kabul, a complicated job at an especially bloody time in the war after the Obama administration surged tens of thousands of troops to battle the Taliban.
“Anyone who can keep that group heading in the same direction should be well suited to assisting the Trump team with government transition in the weeks ahead,” Mansoor said.
Meese, a 32-year Army veteran, declined to comment for this story. Originally a field artillery officer, he retired in 2013 and has served most recently as the chief operating officer of the American Armed Forces Mutual Aid Association, a nonprofit that helps military families with insurance, financial planning and survivor assistance. He’s seen as someone capable of assisting the Trump transition with both veterans and defense issues.
Former colleagues describe him as affable, pragmatic and private with his political views. His father, Edwin, also is involved in the Trump transition, and is a longtime member of the Republican Party who served in several roles in the Reagan administration, including as attorney general.
“I suppose it makes sense that Mike would have inherited the same contacts and be recognized by the new administration for his gravitas,” said Bruce Hoffman, the director of the Center for Security Studies at Georgetown University. He recruited Meese to teach there part-time after he retired from the Army because he found his work as a founding member of the Combating Terrorism Center at the U.S. Military Academy impressive.
“I think he’s an enormously accomplished scholar and leader, and I’ve always found to have both an intellectual and practical approach,” Hoffman said.
In 2014, Meese argued in a piece written for the National Defense University that polarization in politics has limited the ability to enhance national security. He cited the federally mandated budget cuts known as sequestration, and argued that if defense spending must be cut, it should be used to bring down the federal deficit, and not spent on social programs.
“While some might argue the military should not comment on domestic programs or entitlement spending, it is not only appropriate, but it is essential that leaders provide their best judgment about the impact of those programs on economic security and national defense,” he wrote.
Retired Brig. Gen. Timothy Trainor, who retired as the U.S. Military Academy’s academic dean in the spring, said that Meese was regarded as a team builder at the academy. He did not know Meese was considering a position with the Trump administration, but said him being involved could help reach across the aisle politically.
“The people who know Mike know that he can really help bridge divides and bring people together,” said Trainor, now the president of Mount St. Mary’s University in Maryland. “People who know Mike know that, and know that he will be very helpful to the transition team there.”
Related on Checkpoint
With Trump as commander in chief, ‘America is in uncharted territory’
Sen. Jeff Sessions is known for fighting immigration. Now he could lead Trump’s Pentagon.
Like ‘the day Osama was killed.’: How the military reacted to Donald Trump’s victory