In this occasional series, we will bring you up to speed on the biggest national security stories of the week.
Former FBI director James B. Comey is scheduled to testify before the Senate Intelligence Committee on June 8 in a public hearing that will begin at 10 a.m. The appearance will be the first time Comey has spoken publicly since President Trump fired him last month, and it comes as the law enforcement investigation into possible coordination between the Trump campaign and the Kremlin during the 2016 election is heating up.
Here’s what you need to know about his testimony:
Why does the committee want Comey to testify?
The Senate Intelligence Committee is among several congressional committees investigating possible coordination between the Trump campaign and the Kremlin during the 2016 election, and there are few people on the planet who know more about that than Comey.
Until he was fired on May 9, Comey was leading the FBI’s investigation into Russian meddling, which had started back in July. Now he personally might become a part of the probe, as investigators consider whether Trump obstructed justice in firing him or in interacting with him before his dismissal.
Comey has alleged in memos that Trump asked him to pledge loyalty and to shut down his inquiry into former national security adviser Michael Flynn. Even if Comey can’t talk about sensitive details of an ongoing criminal investigation, legislators will likely want to inquire about his conversations with the president and the circumstances of his firing.
That could be interesting in its own right, and it could further legislators’ look at Russian meddling.
Are there any limits to what Comey can say?
Investigators — led by newly appointed special counsel Robert S. Mueller III — are still working on the Russia case. Even before Mueller was appointed, Comey would almost certainly not have been willing to discuss the details of their work. That is still the case now that Mueller is in charge.
People familiar with the matter, though, say Comey has reached an understanding with Mueller’s office about what he can and cannot discuss, and it seems Comey will be allowed to reveal at least some details of his exchanges with the president.
While Comey’s memos on those exchanges already have been reported on, Comey could offer more detail and context. And his testimony would be the first time he has publicly commented. So far, the memos have only been described to reporters by people who have seen them or been briefed on their contents.
Can the White House stop this?
The president could possibly invoke some form of executive privilege — which is designed to keep sensitive decision-making processes involving the president secret — to stop Comey from testifying. The administration had discussions about privilege with former acting attorney general Sally Yates before she testified before the Senate Judiciary Committee on Russia and other matters last month.
In that case, though, Yates ultimately was allowed to testify, and the White House might be on even shakier footing to try to block Comey. The president, after all, has tweeted extensively about the Russia investigation and even mentioned conversations with Comey in his letter firing the FBI director. Trump claimed in that missive that Comey had told him three times he was not under investigation.
If the White House did block Comey, it would also spark a political outcry and perhaps damage Trump even more than any unflattering testimony.
Will this affect the Russia investigation?
Comey could say something that is of interest to the new special counsel, particularly on the question of whether justice was obstructed. But given that he has already been in touch with Mueller’s office, that seems unlikely.
That’s not to say the hearing won’t be interesting.
Comey is a gifted orator who is not shy about claiming the spotlight. In 2007, he famously described to lawmakers how he raced to the hospital room of Attorney General John Ashcroft to stop, at least for a while, the approval of a National Security Agency surveillance program that he believed to be unlawful. The intervention has become lore in Washington and helped foster Comey’s reputation as a fiercely independent official, unafraid to stand in the way of perceived wrongdoing and then expose it publicly.