ESPN’s on-air and online talent could see a big hit in the network’s forthcoming layoffs. (AP Photo/David Kohl) Job cuts, whether they’re called layoffs or buyouts, are an unpleasant fact of life, and when they hit a sports-media company that bills itself as “the Worldwide Leader,” they’re a hot-button target.
Plenty of social media users, unhappy at the network’s emphasis on debate and de-emphasis on news, were happy to see misfortune strike the company. Of course, the people affected have lives and families and mortgages and pets, and the company’s Bristol, Conn., campus was “in shock” and “frozen” by the departures of what could be 100 colleagues. Others in media, where layoffs and cuts are frequent, felt their pain, lashing back at the lack of compassion on social media.
[Ed Werder is out at ESPN; Hannah Storm takes reduced role]
Never mind that, for years, ESPN was the ultimate destination for sports journalists, many of whom made ungracious exits to go to Bristol. This was a rugged day. James A. Miller, who co-wrote the definitive book on ESPN, tweeted, “If you’re shocked that a solid journalist like @Edwerderespn is on the list, keep your seat belt fastened.” There was a definite sense that the network was complicit in its own problems.
@JimMiller @kirkmin @ESPN Am I supposed to care more about 100 layoffs because it’s from a media outlet? Layoffs happen everyday in the real world
— JJClaaky (@claaky23) April 26, 2017
But a truly wonderful day for those of us who despise ESPN https://t.co/o7vIRMVkZ0
— Brian (@bbens58) April 26, 2017
ESPN is dead.
— Brandon (@bcZeris) April 26, 2017
ESPN’s Jemele Hill and Bleacher Report’s Mike Freeman fired back at those who were reveling in the cuts.
Asking for civility on Twitter is an exercise in frustration, but today ain't the day for you to delight or wish for people to be fired.
— Jemele Hill (@jemelehill) April 26, 2017
It is difficult day at ESPN. So I'm seriously not here for the nonsense.
— Jemele Hill (@jemelehill) April 26, 2017
If you are one of the dirtbags reveling in ESPN's layoffs, go to hell in a hand basket you pathetic piece of garbage.
— mike freeman (@mikefreemanNFL) April 26, 2017
Can someone please explain to this guy the difference between reporting and celebrating? https://t.co/J2SDVtUNIx
— mike freeman (@mikefreemanNFL) April 26, 2017
It sucks anytime anyone loses any job. Journalists aren’t sad because our jobs matter more. It’s because this is happening to our friends.
— Gary Parrish (@GaryParrishCBS) April 26, 2017
Part of the schadenfreude comes from ESPN’s broadened approach to coverage. It no longer just reports, it constantly has people debating. Often, those debates center on the employment of athletes and team management, and everyone has favorites there.
@jemelehill Stephen A. rants about how Phil Jackson needs to be fired, ESPN made it a promotional commercial for First Take, pot meet kettle……..
— Craig Murdock (@CraigMurdock11) April 26, 2017
@jemelehill You guys discuss which #NFL coaches should be fired the entire week leading up to week 17.
— Jerome Butcher (@PimpinVanSmack) April 26, 2017
Not that ESPN will ever see this, or care, but we don't want sports generalists. We want sports specialists. The people you're letting go.
— Andrew Bolte (@albolte) April 26, 2017
There was plenty of criticism from users who believe the network lost the thread of sports, becoming along the way “MSESPN,” as Outkick the Coverage’s Clay Travis put it. “Stick to sports” is a mantra the network has ignored, he says.
“Middle America wants to pop a beer and listen to sports talk, they don’t want to be lectured about why Caitlyn Jenner is a hero, Michael Sam is the new Jackie Robinson of sports, and Colin Kaepernick is the Rosa Parks of football,” he writes. “ESPN made the mistake of trying to make liberal social media losers happy and as a result lost millions of viewers.”
⚡️ “ESPN expected to lay off over 100 on-air talents”
Hope it's the ones' that think the "P" in ESPN stands for politics.— Dan Smith (@songsmithdan) April 26, 2017
#Marvel, NFL, ESPN learn progressive politics is bad for their bottom line: @ilikerox — https://t.co/VB9Emi4ASx | #sports #maga #tcot pic.twitter.com/agJLskpma7
— The Rebel (@TheRebelTV) April 16, 2017
ESPN will, of course, move forward with more personality-driven spirited debate and opinion shows more prevalent than ever.
Re: ESPN. It's startling to see how many of the people losing jobs provided the info/stories for the talking heads to … discuss.
— Mike Sielski (@MikeSielski) April 26, 2017
"ESPN use to be about sports."
Is the new
"MTV use to have music videos."
— Colt Barber (@Colt_Barber) April 26, 2017
What you get on ESPN is overbearing analysis of particular athletes and teams rather than a snapshot and update on all that is going on
— Mark Artes (@SuperSurfFan91) April 26, 2017
ESPN layoffs have nothing to do with politics – they're about a broken broadcasting rights model causing losses across the industry
— Tim Cline (@timcline10) April 26, 2017
It is immensely frustrating on this day to know that ESPN management was willing to pay Skip Bayless millions of dollars last year to stay.
— Richard Deitsch (@richarddeitsch) April 26, 2017
ESPN is firing all these people but wanted to pay Skip millions and are keeping Stephen A. SMITH. they want characters not reporters
— DRED (@DRED1224) April 26, 2017
The problem at ESPN is too much 'E' and not enough 'S'.
— Major Cody (@MiloCodyO4) April 26, 2017