The Washington PostDemocracy Dies in Darkness

The Patriots definitely did not get all the calls in the Super Bowl

The Philadelphia Eagles defeated the New England Patriots to win Super Bowl LII on Feb. 4. Eagles fans took the streets, light poles and rooftops to celebrate. (Video: Amber Ferguson, Nic Justice, Branden Eastwood/The Washington Post)

The Patriots lost Super Bowl 52, but they can perhaps console themselves with the fact that they will probably be hearing a lot less about how they supposedly get all the calls from officiating crews. Referees passed up reasonable opportunities to negate Eagles touchdowns in the second, third and fourth quarters Sunday, helping Philadelphia to a 41-33 triumph.

NFL players were as blown away by the Nick Foles touchdown catch as everyone else

On the first of the touchdowns, Nick Foles caught a pass on a trick play near the Patriots’ goal line with just a few seconds left in the second quarter. Somewhat lost amid the excitement over Philadelphia’s gutsy call, however, was the fact that — as some noted — the Eagles could have been flagged for an illegal formation with only six, not seven, men on the line.

However, officials could have judged that wide receiver Alshon Jeffery was close enough to the line at the right side of the formation to merit a no-call. On the preceding play, some observers thought Jeffery should have drawn a pass-interference call, after he fell to the turf while being defended on an incomplete pass into the end zone.

Analysis: The Patriots are getting the calls, and that shouldn’t stop in Super Bowl 52

In addition, a previous play involving Jeffery, on which he tipped a ball into the air that was then intercepted by the Patriots, drew some howls that New England should have been flagged for pass interference. That was red meat for the “Pats get all the calls” crowd, not to mention a number of disgruntled Eagles fans, but Philadelphia appeared to catch something of a break on a third-quarter score.

On that play, Foles hit running back Corey Clement for a 22-yard touchdown in the back of the end zone. While the play was undergoing its mandatory review, replays indicated Clement might not have had full possession of the ball, at least as defined by the NFL’s stringent catch rules, before going out of bounds.

On NBC’s telecast, analyst Cris Collinsworth expressed confidence that, upon further review, the touchdown catch would be overturned. However, officials allowed it to stand, prompting Collinsworth to say, “I give up.”

Collinsworth had a point, in that there were several instances during the regular season in which a receiver appeared to bobble the ball ever so slightly as he went out of the end zone, resulting in touchdowns being overturned. One prominent example came in a Week 16 game, and when Bills wide receiver Kelvin Benjamin’s score was taken away, many pointed out that the opposing team just happened to be the Patriots, and not for the first time.

The cleat was on the other foot Sunday, with the Patriots on the wrong end of game-changing referee decisions. Two former NFL executives in charge of officiating, Mike Pereira and Dean Blandino, agreed that it was correct to let Clement’s touchdown stand.

The biggest call that did not go New England’s way came with just over two minutes left, when Philadelphia’s Zach Ertz caught a pass near the end zone, took three steps and launched himself into the end zone. The tight end lost control of the ball as it hit the turf, sparking much debate about whether the NFL would judge that he failed to complete the catch, or that he had already become a runner before he dived and thus scored as soon as the ball broke the plane of the end zone.

Sure enough, after a review, the Eagles again had a touchdown upheld. Some saw fit to recall a similar play in the regular season on which the Steelers’ Jesse James had a score overturned, benefiting the Patriots, but others noted that Ertz took an extra, crucial step on his play. Some also pointed out a 2015 playoff game in which the Cowboys’ Dez Bryant was ruled to have lost control of the ball after he appeared to have been reaching out toward the end zone with it.

The ultimate result of the three Eagles touchdowns, in terms of the outcome of the game, was critical, given that they won by eight points. Philadelphia, of course, played extremely well, particularly Foles, who was a backup most of the season, so the team need not feel like it got any unnecessary help in toppling the Patriots. However, New England and its fans, if they so choose, can look back with some irritation about a few of the referees’ decisions.

Read more from The Post:

Tom Brady says he’ll play next season regardless of Super Bowl outcome

Super Bowl 2018: Philadelphia preps poles with oil; No Prince hologram at halftime

Steelers’ Ryan Shazier reportedly begins walking routine

NFL player Edwin Jackson killed by suspected drunk driver

President Trump is over the NFL (mostly). But the league still is feeling the fallout.