The report comes after freshman offensive lineman Jordan McNair died in June. The 19-year-old suffered heatstroke during a team workout in May and later died two weeks later. An attorney for the family told ESPN that McNair had a seizure on a practice field after running sprints, and Maryland athletic trainers waited nearly an hour before calling emergency personnel to provide treatment. Maryland officials dispute this account. The school launched an external review of his death, which is ongoing.
The ESPN investigation also describes a culture of mistreatment in which coaches — namely Durkin, and strength and conditioning coach Rick Court — used conditioning, weightlifting and nutrition regimens to punish and intimidate players.
Muschamp in a Saturday news conference defended Durkin, who worked for Muschamp as defensive coordinator at Florida from 2011 to 2014.
“He’s an outstanding football coach, but he’s also an outstanding husband and a father, and he treats people with respect,” Muschamp said.
#Gamecocks @CoachWMuschamp delivered a fiery response to a question about an @espn story, which portrays the Maryland football program under DJ Durkin in a bad light. Durkin used to work w/ coach. "There’s no credibility in anonymous sources. I think that's gutless." @wis10 pic.twitter.com/ny60Xb8jIO— Joe Gorchow (@joegorchowWIS) August 11, 2018
Muschamp then took aim at the ESPN article and decried the practice of using anonymous sources as a “lack of journalistic integrity.”
“There’s no credibility in anonymous sources,” Muschamp said. “If that former staffer had any guts, why didn’t he put his name on that? I think that’s gutless. And in any business and in any company and in any football team, especially right here in August, you can find a disgruntled player that’s probably not playing. So I think it’s a lack of journalistic integrity to print things with anonymous sources. But I know DJ Durkin personally. And I know what kind of man he is, and I know what kind of person he is. I talked to him this morning, and I don’t think it’s right.”
Journalists use anonymous sources mainly to protect those willing to speak up from retribution, whether it’s physical, psychological or in regards to future employment. A bruised ego or not wanting to tick off the boss generally is not a good enough reason to grant a source anonymity.
In this case, it’s fair to assume the former staffer and two current players at Maryland whom ESPN quoted anonymously could be adversely affected if Durkin, university officials or other college/professional football coaches knew their identities.
News organizations often have strict regulations governing the use of unnamed sources. Many require two sources who can corroborate each other’s story. High-ranking editors generally must know the name of the sources. Reporters frequently cannot promise a source anonymity without consulting newsroom leadership.
Those on Twitter, especially sports journalism figures, were quick to give Muschamp a lesson on journalistic integrity.
Muschamp’s answer here shows exactly why people felt they had to speak anonymously in order to shine a light on the toxic culture within college football.— Nicole Auerbach (@NicoleAuerbach) August 11, 2018
Anonymous sources ended Richard Nixon’s presidency. Will Muschamp is a dope and sounds like someone who doesn’t care about the facts.— Medium Happy (@jdubs88) August 11, 2018
Muschamp’s comments are a shame, because earlier in the news conference he had pretty insightful perspective on how to constructively critique an athlete.
“You need to criticize the performance, not the performer,” he said. “And I think that that’s something we talk about as a staff a lot. And there’s a certain way that you can talk to a young man about how he’s playing and what he needs to do to improve.”
Read more from The Post: