The new research, which was published last week in the journal Geophysical Research Letters, focuses on a field of study known as “bathymetry” — basically, the study of underwater topography, or what the floor of a body of water looks like. Bathymetry studies are important because they help scientists understand how the ocean interacts with glaciers — and that’s important because these interactions are increasingly believed to be critical processes affecting ice loss, in Greenland and elsewhere.
“We know a lot of the mass loss of the glaciers is due to melting at the glacier front,” said Martin Truffer, a physics professor and glacier expert at the University of Alaska Fairbanks, who was not involved with the new research. “And that melting happens because warm water can get right up to the ice and melt it that way.”
It’s also believed that warm ocean water can help destabilize glaciers from the bottom up, melting the ice where it’s grounded to the seafloor and eventually causing large chunks to break away.
Truffer pointed out that it’s “only in the last 10-plus years that people really started realizing how much of a role melting by ocean water played.” So scientists are still getting a handle on the kinds of information we need to really understand the process. And one under-studied part of the picture is underwater topography.
Glaciers have a tendency to affect their surrounding environment in significant ways, by eroding the landscape and cutting fjords, or narrow inlets, into the coastline. These fjords fill up with water, and the deeper they are, the more warm ocean water can get in and have contact with the glacier. Having accurate data on the locations, depths and water temperatures of these features can help scientists figure out which glaciers might be more vulnerable to melt and can even help inform the models researchers use to predict future ice loss.
The problem is that there’s been very little data collected on this front, said Eric Rignot, a University of California Irvine glaciologist and senior research scientist at NASA’s Jet Propulsion Laboratory, who led the new study.
“The fjords are vastly unmapped, and we don’t have historical data on ocean temperature in the fjords,” he said. “The waters we have to navigate are a little bit treacherous because of the presence of icebergs. And also…there’s not been a very focused scientific interest in these fjords in the past.”
As a result, published bathymetric maps of the Arctic — notably, the International Bathymetric Chart of the Arctic Ocean, which is a collaborative effort among institutions around the world — tend to estimate the depths of glacial fjords based on the data collected closest to the coastline, Truffer said.
So Rignot and an international team of researchers took it upon themselves to map out 14 glacial fjords in West Greenland, north of the famous Ilulissat Glacier. At various points between 2007 and 2014, they measured temperature and depth in these fjords and used sonar to map out underwater topographic features. They found that the actual seafloor depths were anywhere from 100 to 1,000 meters deeper than what was previously suggested by the charts.
“We knew the prior bathymetric maps were wrong, and this paper shows just how far they were wrong,” said Ian Joughin, a glacier expert at the University of Washington, by email.
The new measurements represent “a game changer for looking at the interaction of ice and ocean,” Rignot said. “One of the reasons it makes a difference is that the warm water — which you don’t find at the surface in Greenland, but several hundred meters below — has much easier access to the glaciers than would be represented in past charts.”
This could be a big deal when it comes modeling studies of Greenland’s glaciers, which rely on the best available data in order to give scientists an accurate look at how the ice might react to its environment in the future. “Without this bathymetric data there’s no way the models can represent the interaction of ice and ocean correctly,” Rignot said.
Notably, though, the study also suggests that there are much more complex factors at work when it comes to ice loss in Greenland. While ocean-ice interactions are now believed to be one of the dominant processes affecting the glaciers, the new study indicated that there’s not always a direct correlation between how much warm water is hitting the ice and how quickly a glacier is retreating.
“Given that the community has long assumed that the warm water was reaching these glaciers, the authors seem to show that the glaciers are less vulnerable to warm water than expected,” Joughin said.
After comparing the new bathymetric data with knowledge of how glaciers in the region have changed over the years, the research found some glaciers standing in warm Atlantic water had not retreated at all in the past few decades, while other glaciers grounded in shallow, cold water had retreated significantly. Other factors, such as mechanical instabilities or weaknesses in the ice, which may differ from one glacier to the next, are likely at play in these kinds of cases.
But the collection of accurate fjord measurements is still among the biggest priorities for modern-day glaciology. In fact, an ongoing NASA mission is addressing that very issue. The Oceans Melting Greenland, or OMG, mission kicked off last April with the goal of measuring ocean temperatures and modeling the shape and depth of the seafloor in Greenland to help scientists better understand the role the ocean plays in the melting of the ice sheet.
“OMG will basically extend the type of mapping we did in these two fjord systems to pretty much all the large-scale systems in Greenland,” Rignot said. So soon scientists may have accurate data for most of the ice sheet.
It’s an endeavor that highlights a critical area of science many people may think has already been completely covered, Truffer said.
“Nowadays, we think that mapping is not really an issue anymore — we’ve mapped the Earth,” he said. “But clearly, there are fairly large areas that we have really no clear idea about what the map of the bottom of the ocean there looks like. That’s quite astonishing.”