Until this week, Barrasso has refrained from criticizing any of Pruitt’s actions while in office, instead praising the EPA administrator’s deregulatory agenda. On Monday, however, Barrasso raised concern about the Government Accountability Office’s report that EPA had violated federal spending laws by failing to notify Congress before installing a private phone booth in Pruiit’s office last year at a cost of $43,000.
“During your confirmation hearing, I specifically asked you to ‘refrain from taking any action — that makes it difficult or impossible for the public to access your official written communications under the Freedom of Information Act,’ ” Barrasso wrote Pruitt. “You agreed to my request.”
“Can you affirm that the EPA does in fact search all your official email accounts when responding to FOIA requests?” Barrasso added.
EPA spokesman Jahan Wilcox said in a statement that Pruitt uses three email accounts, while a fourth one created for him was tested only a few times before becoming inactive.
“When EPA receives a FOIA request concerning the Administrator’s emails, all accounts associated are searched before we respond to that request,” said the EPA’s acting chief information officer, Steve Fine, in a statement.
But Ken Cook, president of the advocacy organization Environmental Working Group, said Pruitt needs to be more transparent about his operations.
“Between his four email accounts and his $43,000 private phone booth, Pruitt is taking all the appropriate steps to keep lawmakers, journalists and the prying eyes of taxpayers from learning what he’s been up to since becoming the head of EPA,” Cook said in a statement.