In sharp contrast to the days when the bay was so beleaguered that every meaningful species experienced sharp population declines, officials and scientists from the District, Maryland and Virginia announced Friday that it is in the midst of a full and remarkable recovery. As if to underscore the progress, their backdrop along the District’s southwest waterfront was a brilliantly sunny morning and a picturesque view of the Anacostia River, which feeds into the Chesapeake.
The bay’s overall grade is a C, because some areas, such as the Patuxent, Patapsco and York rivers, are bouncing back from near-failure. The category of water clarity faltered, falling to an F from last year’s D. But the James River area and the lower stem of the bay closer to the Atlantic both earned grades of at least B-, their highest ever, and shored up the overall score.
“We have seen individual regions improving before but not the entire Chesapeake Bay,” said Bill Dennison, vice president for science application at the University of Maryland Center for Environmental Science. “It seems that the restoration efforts are beginning to take hold.”
Seven out of the 15 regions, including Patapsco and Back rivers (with Baltimore), show significantly improving health. The Potomac River region, which includes part of the District, is holding steady.
“The long-term trend is statistically, significantly improving over time,” said Alexandra Fries, a senior science communicator at the center. “There are no regions in decline.”
The 15-year, $19 billion cleanup plan is administered by the Environmental Protection Agency and holds the six states in the Chesapeake watershed to specific pollution limits. Under the plan, which President Barack Obama mandated in 2010 through an executive order, Virginia, Maryland, Delaware, West Virginia, Pennsylvania and New York, along with the District, agreed to substantially improve wastewater treatment facilities and decrease runoff from farms once responsible for significant amounts of waste reaching the rivers and streams that run into the bay.
Studies have shown that cutting such pollution — nitrogen and phosphorous from human activities, as well as sediment from dusty building sites — has reduced the size and number of “dead zones” where fish, oysters and other creatures die in oxygen-depleted water.
Marine scientists created the bay’s report card 12 years ago to explain the complicated statistical data they collect. In 2011, the year with the worst marks, a dead zone extended from the Baltimore Harbor to the bay’s mid-channel region in the Potomac River. That covered 83 miles, or a third of the bay.
The environmental science center recently released a report showing that decreasing nutrient loads from farms and urban treatment plants are causing dead zones to break up earlier in the summer, the season when they thrive.
“It’s very much related to the improvements we’re starting to see in the bay health overall,” Dennison said, “yet another sign that things are improving on a baywide level, and that’s really a powerful story.”
Scientists credit the cleanup plan with fueling the turnaround. Although President Trump tried to eliminate the plan’s funding in his fiscal 2018 budget proposal and cut it by 90 percent for fiscal 2019, congressional support for the restoration effort remains strong.
“We all need to continue working in a bipartisan way … to support the science and good conservation practices,” Benjamin H. Grumbles, Maryland’s environment secretary, said at the report card announcement. “We need the EPA to keep everyone’s feet to the fire.”
Grumbles noted earlier this week that big challenges remain, including his state’s effort to address the enormous sediment buildup behind the Conowingo Hydroelectric Dam that sits on the Susquehanna River at Maryland’s border with Pennsylvania. According to a report issued last year by the EPA’s Chesapeake Bay Program, a reservoir behind the dam has filled with sediment far sooner than the EPA anticipated. Its ability to hold back that sediment, which scours bay grasses and degrades their life-sustaining capabilities, was a major factor in the cleanup plan’s success.
The reservoir is 95 percent full and could stop protecting the bay in the next three years, the report concluded, not the 2030-2035 timeline the agency had projected.
And in a 2016 study, Johns Hopkins University scientists William Ball Robert Hirsch and Qian Zhang noted a U.S. Geological Survey estimate that sediment and phosphorus “would increase by about 250 percent and 70 percent respectively” when the Conowingo Reservoir reaches capacity.
Another sign that the bay’s recovery could again struggle is this year’s blue crab survey, which showed lower populations than the 2017 survey that factored into the new report card. The abundance of female crabs drove last year’s higher number, but crabs suffer in extreme cold, and the past winter was far harsher than the previous one. The 2018 survey showed a significant drop in the number of female crabs.
Virginia and Maryland have taken steps to protect the animals from commercial fishing, but the number of crabs harvested continues to fluctuate.
“While we can celebrate progress being made in the restoration of Chesapeake Bay, we can’t take our foot off of the accelerator,” Peter Goodwin, president of the environmental science center, said in a statement Friday. “It is critically important that we continue to invest in science and monitoring to improve management actions which ensure that the bay continues on its path to recovery.”