The Washington Post

Furloughs wouldn’t happen until April under sequester

Many furloughs would not take place until April if the automatic spending cuts known as the sequester take place on March 1, according to an Obama administration official.

Office of Management and Budget controller Danny Werfel on Thursday echoed what the administration said last month in a memo to federal agencies, telling the Senate appropriations committee that “legal requirements” would delay the onset of unpaid leave for defense workers if Congress fails to approve a debt-reduction deal before the March deadline.

Werfel was referring to the requirement for agencies to bargain with unions and provide 30 days notice before furloughs take effect. But the government could implement other cost-saving measures before the furloughs would take effect.

“Sequestration is bad policy, and the administration believes that Congress should pass balanced, bipartisan deficit reduction to avoid it,” Werfel said. “If allowed to occur, sequestration would have significant and destructive consequences for domestic investments, national security, and core government services.”

Werfel summarized the government-wide impacts of sequestration this way:

“It would mean fewer teachers to educate our children, less funding for schools to help disadvantaged students with children with disabilities, less research into life-threatening diseases. It would cut nutrition assistance for vulnerable populations, and reduce funding for essential mental health programs.


It would keep federal agencies from conducting the inspections necessary to keep our food, our air, and our water safe and clean. It would make our country less secure at home, reducing our ability to protect our borders, stay ahead of emerging cybersecurity threats, and keep crime off our streets and out of our neighborhoods. And it would make us less safe abroad, by causing critical degradations in the support for and readiness of our armed forces.”


Asked about food inspections and air-traffic controllers, Werfel said neither would be exempt from sequestration. He explained that food-manufacturing plants may experience temporary shutdowns because they cannot operate without inspections and that nearly all air-traffic controllers would face unpaid leave.

More information about the impacts of the sequester is available in The Washington Post’s roundup of recent warnings from high-level officials, including Secretary of State John Kerry, Department of Homeland Security Secretary Janet Napolitano and Deputy Defense Secretary Ashton Carter.

For more federal news, visit The Federal Eye, The Fed Page and Post Politics.

To connect with Josh Hicks, follow him on Twitter, subscribe to his Facebook page or e-mail

E-mail with news tips and other suggestions.

Josh Hicks covers Maryland politics and government. He previously anchored the Post’s Federal Eye blog, focusing on federal accountability and workforce issues.

The Freddie Gray case

Please provide a valid email address.

You’re all set!

Campaign 2016 Email Updates

Please provide a valid email address.

You’re all set!

Get Zika news by email

Please provide a valid email address.

You’re all set!
Show Comments
The Democrats debate Thursday. Get caught up on the race.
The big questions after New Hampshire, from The Post's Dan Balz
Can Bernie Sanders cut into Hillary Clinton's strength in the minority community and turn his challenge into a genuine threat? And can any of the Republicans consolidate anti-Trump sentiment in the party in time to stop the billionaire developer and reality-TV star, whose unorthodox, nationalistic campaign has shaken the foundations of American politics?
Clinton in New Hampshire: 2008 vs. 2015
Hillary Clinton did about as well in N.H. this year as she did in 2008, percentage-wise. In the state's main counties, Clinton performed on average only about two percentage points worse than she did eight years ago (according to vote totals as of Wednesday morning) -- and in five of the 10 counties, she did as well or better.
Upcoming debates
Feb. 11: Democratic debate

on PBS, in Wisconsin

Feb 13: GOP debate

on CBS News, in South Carolina

Feb. 25: GOP debate

on CNN, in Houston, Texas

Campaign 2016
Where the race stands

To keep reading, please enter your email address.

You’ll also receive from The Washington Post:
  • A free 6-week digital subscription
  • Our daily newsletter in your inbox

Please enter a valid email address

I have read and agree to the Terms of Service and Privacy Policy.

Please indicate agreement.

Thank you.

Check your inbox. We’ve sent an email explaining how to set up an account and activate your free digital subscription.