The Washington Post

Obama to propose $35 billion in federal retirement program savings

President Obama is expected to propose $35 billion in federal retirement program savings in the fiscal year 2014 budget plan he will release Wednesday.

(Charles Dharapak/AP) (Charles Dharapak/AP)

In a briefing with White House reporters, a senior administration official indicated the budget savings would come through increased charges to federal employees for their retirement benefits. The savings figure was not included in new documents provided to reporters, but the White House indicated the budget will incorporate savings outlined in an administration’s previously released plan to reduce the deficit.

That plan calls for saving $35 billion through “reform federal retirement programs.”

Already, the federal workforce is contributing more toward retirement. Employees hired this year and later, except those with five years of previous federal service, will pay 3.1 percent of their salaries toward their pensions. Most employees currently contribute 0.8 percent.

While the details of the $35 billion in federal retirement savings for FY 2014 were not specified, in September 2011, the White House proposed saving $21 billion, from 2013 through 2021, by increasing employee defined benefit contributions and another $16 billion, from 2014 through 2021, through other federal retirement cuts. The White House, in 2011, recommended increasing the employee contribution to their retirement by 1.2 percentage points over three years, while cutting the government’s share by an equal amount.

The National Active and Retired Federal Employees Association criticized one part of the plan using a less-generous index to increase benefits in retirement programs including Social Security and federal retirement.

“We are disappointed to learn the president’s first proposed budget since his reelection will embrace a policy designed to balance the budget by cutting the earned benefits of America’s seniors, veterans and those with disabilities,” NARFE President Joseph A. Beaudoin said in a statement. “If President Obama endorses the chained CPI inflation formula to calculate the cost-of-living adjustments for Americans, as has been reported, he will be turning his back on the populations most in need of assistance.”

American Federation of Government Employees National President J. David Cox Sr. called the retirement proposals a “betrayal” by the administration on the heels of the already enacted contributions increase, the salary rate freeze and sequestration cuts that threaten unpaid furloughs starting soon.

“We cannot understand how an administration that claims to stand up for working and middle-class Americans can simultaneously push policies that would impose such enormous pain on its own workforce,” he said in a statement. “This proposal is as unnecessary as it is cruel, and we urge lawmakers to reject it entirely.”

National Treasury Employees Union President Colleen M. Kelley also weighed in: “Federal employees chose to serve our country through public service but they did not sign up to single-handedly offset a budget deficit they did not cause. While some administration officials are donating back some of their salary in solidarity with federal employees, it seems to me that a better approach would be to recognize the value of federal employees, understand that that they have given enough from their own pockets and not ask them to give any more.”

Eric Yoder contributed to this report.

This post has been updated.

federaldiay@washpost.com
Twitter: @JoeDavidsonWP

Joe Davidson writes the Federal Diary, a column about federal government and workplace issues that celebrated its 80th birthday in November 2012. Davidson previously was an assistant city editor at The Washington Post and a Washington and foreign correspondent with The Wall Street Journal, where he covered federal agencies and political campaigns.

The Freddie Gray case

Please provide a valid email address.

You’re all set!

Campaign 2016 Email Updates

Please provide a valid email address.

You’re all set!
Comments
Show Comments
The New Hampshire primary is Tuesday. Get caught up on the race.
The Post's Dan Balz says ...
This was supposed to be the strongest Republican presidential field in memory, but cracks are showing. At Saturday night's debate, Marco Rubio withered in the face of unyielding attacks from Chris Christie, drawing attention to the biggest question about his candidacy: Is he ready to be president? How much the debate will affect Rubio's standing Tuesday is anybody's guess. But even if he does well, the question about his readiness to serve as president and to go up against Clinton, if she is the Democratic nominee, will linger.
Listen
Play Video
New Hampshire polling averages
Donald Trump holds a commanding lead in the next state to vote, but Marco Rubio has recently seen a jump in his support, according to polls.
New Hampshire polling averages
A victory in New Hampshire revitalized Hillary Clinton's demoralized campaign in 2008. But this time, she's trailing Bernie Sanders, from neighboring Vermont. She left the state Sunday to go to Flint, Mich., where a cost-saving decision led to poisonous levels of lead in the water of the poor, heavily black, rust-belt city. 
55% 40%
Listen
Play Video
Upcoming debates
Feb. 11: Democratic debate

on PBS, in Wisconsin

Feb 13: GOP debate

on CBS News, in South Carolina

Feb. 25: GOP debate

on CNN, in Houston, Texas

Campaign 2016
State of the race

To keep reading, please enter your email address.

You’ll also receive from The Washington Post:
  • A free 6-week digital subscription
  • Our daily newsletter in your inbox

Please enter a valid email address

I have read and agree to the Terms of Service and Privacy Policy.

Please indicate agreement.

Thank you.

Check your inbox. We’ve sent an email explaining how to set up an account and activate your free digital subscription.