The Washington Post

Insurance providers will debate who should provide health benefits to federal employees

Health-insurance providers will debate the merits of allowing more types of plans to participate in the federal-employee health-benefit program during a House subcommittee hearing on Thursday.

A representative from UnitedHealth Group will urge lawmakers to draft legislation that allows regional and state preferred provider organizations, or PPOs, to join the benefit program, according to an advanced copy of testimony the company plans to deliver before the House panel that oversees federal-workforce programs.

The group argues that such a move would increase competition within the benefit program and help keep costs in check.

Blue Cross Blue Shield, which covers more than 60 percent of the federal workforce as the sole provider of the program’s government-wide “service benefit plan,” will argue for blocking participation by carriers not willing to offer uniform premiums nationwide, according to advanced testimony from the organization.

The insurance-industry giant is concerned that smaller providers will cherry pick low-cost regions, ultimately driving up premiums for nationwide plans. The group estimates that 54 percent of federal employees would see their premiums increase if regional PPOs are allowed into the mix.

A representative from the nation’s largest federal-employee union is also scheduled to testify Thursday. The American Federation of Government Employees will raise concerns about a 40 percent excise tax on high-cost “Cadillac” health plans starting in 2018, according to the group’s prepared remarks.

AFGE contends that the tax, which comes as a provision of the Affordable Care Act, will make health benefits less affordable for federal employees whose plans meet the threshold. The union argues that some workers pay high premiums that would meet the bar because of greed on the part of insurance providers, as well as a lack of push back from the Office of Personnel Management, which negotiates the rates.

AFGE also plans to speak out against potential efforts to convert the federal-employee health-benefit program into a premium-support plan — known among critics as a voucher system — or to change formularies in a way that raises costs for workers, according to the group’s prepared remarks.

For more federal news, visit The Federal Eye, The Fed Page and Post Politics.

To connect with Josh Hicks, follow his Twitter feed, subscribe to his Facebook page or e-mail

E-mail with news tips and other suggestions.

Josh Hicks covers Maryland politics and government. He previously anchored the Post’s Federal Eye blog, focusing on federal accountability and workforce issues.



Success! Check your inbox for details. You might also like:

Please enter a valid email address

See all newsletters

Show Comments
Most Read



Success! Check your inbox for details.

See all newsletters

Your Three. Video curated for you.
Next Story
Josh Hicks · April 10, 2013

To keep reading, please enter your email address.

You’ll also receive from The Washington Post:
  • A free 6-week digital subscription
  • Our daily newsletter in your inbox

Please enter a valid email address

I have read and agree to the Terms of Service and Privacy Policy.

Please indicate agreement.

Thank you.

Check your inbox. We’ve sent an email explaining how to set up an account and activate your free digital subscription.