The Washington Post

Fed retirement system works but problems remain, OPM says

A House committee will hear different takes on how well the retirement system for federal employees is working at a hearing Thursday.

The Office of Personnel Management (OPM) has “implemented several initiatives to develop a 21st Century customer-focused retirement processing system that adjudicates claims in a timely and accurate manner,” Kenneth Zawodny, OPM associate director for retirement services, says in testimony submitted to the Oversight and Government Reform subcommittee on the federal workforce.

The agency’s inspector general, Patrick M. McFarland acknowledges that “OPM has been largely successful in administering the program and meeting the needs of the 2.5 million Federal retirees,” but his testimony also identifies several problems, including a falling accuracy rate and “a lack of leadership commitment” to solve problems with improper payments to dead people.

The falling accuracy rate requires additional work to correct errors and creates delay in getting proper payments to retirees and their families, he said.

“[S]enior leadership within OPM, and specifically RS (retirement services),” McFarland added, “has not demonstrated a sustained commitment to establishing an active and continuing effort to address improper payments made to deceased annuitants.”

federaldiary@washpost.com

Twitter: @JoeDavidsonWP

 

Joe Davidson writes the Federal Diary, a column about federal government and workplace issues that celebrated its 80th birthday in November 2012. Davidson previously was an assistant city editor at The Washington Post and a Washington and foreign correspondent with The Wall Street Journal, where he covered federal agencies and political campaigns.

The Freddie Gray case

Please provide a valid email address.

You’re all set!

Campaign 2016 Email Updates

Please provide a valid email address.

You’re all set!

Get Zika news by email

Please provide a valid email address.

You’re all set!
Comments
Show Comments
New Hampshire has voted. The Democrats debate Thursday. Get caught up on the race.
The big questions after New Hampshire, from The Post's Dan Balz
Can Bernie Sanders cut into Hillary Clinton's strength in the minority community and turn his challenge into a genuine threat? And can any of the Republicans consolidate anti-Trump sentiment in the party in time to stop the billionaire developer and reality-TV star, whose unorthodox, nationalistic campaign has shaken the foundations of American politics?
What happened in New Hampshire
Spending per vote
John Kasich is running one of the most cost-efficient campaigns, bested only by Donald Trump. Ben Carson, however, has spent a lot for a fourth-place finish in Iowa and eight-place finish in New Hampshire. Data is available through the end of December.
Upcoming debates
Feb. 11: Democratic debate

on PBS, in Wisconsin

Feb 13: GOP debate

on CBS News, in South Carolina

Feb. 25: GOP debate

on CNN, in Houston, Texas

Campaign 2016
What happened in N.H.

To keep reading, please enter your email address.

You’ll also receive from The Washington Post:
  • A free 6-week digital subscription
  • Our daily newsletter in your inbox

Please enter a valid email address

I have read and agree to the Terms of Service and Privacy Policy.

Please indicate agreement.

Thank you.

Check your inbox. We’ve sent an email explaining how to set up an account and activate your free digital subscription.