The Washington Post

Senate panel to discuss ‘regulatory paralysis’

A new Senate oversight panel plans to hold its first-ever hearing on Thursday to discuss the federal regulation-review process.

The Senate Judiciary’s Subcommittee on Oversight, Federal Rights and Agency Action will examine the impacts of “regulatory paralysis,” with lawmakers likely to focus on a review backlog that has prevented the implementation of new rules for years in some cases.

Subcommittee Chairman Richard Blumenthal (D-Conn.) and other senators, including two Republicans, raised concerns about the delays in a letter last month to Sylvia Burwell, the recently confirmed head of the White House Office of Management and Budget.

CORRECTION_EPA_Mercury_Rules_01d0a-611_image_1024w (Ross D. Franklin/AP)

The lawmakers urged Burwell to address the issue with “prompt action,” adding that “with Congress often paralyzed by gridlock, the public is depending on the federal agencies to protect public health and welfare.”

A division of the White House budget office reviews draft regulations to estimate their potential costs and benefits, as well as to consider alternatives, before agencies implement them.

The senators said in their letter that the review office frequently puts draft regulations on hold without explaining its concerns. “If there are problems with rules or guidance submitted by an agency, those problems should be aired and addressed, not kept hidden behind closed doors,” the letter said.

Under an executive order issued by President Bill Clinton in 1993 and later reaffirmed by President Obama, the review office is supposed to finish its reviews within a 90-day timeframe, but the process often stretches on for more than a year with stakeholders in limbo.

To connect with Josh Hicks, follow his Twitter feed, friend his Facebook page or e-mail josh.hicks@washpost.comFor more federal news, visit The Federal Eye, The Fed Page and Post Politics. E-mail federalworker@washpost.com with news tips and other suggestions.

Josh Hicks covers Maryland politics and government. He previously anchored the Post’s Federal Eye blog, focusing on federal accountability and workforce issues.

The Freddie Gray case

Please provide a valid email address.

You’re all set!

Campaign 2016 Email Updates

Please provide a valid email address.

You’re all set!

Get Zika news by email

Please provide a valid email address.

You’re all set!
Comments
Show Comments
The Democrats debated Thursday night. Get caught up on the race.
The Post's Chris Cillizza on the Democratic debate...
On Clinton: She poked a series of holes in Sanders's health-care proposal and broadly cast him as someone who talks a big game but simply can't hope to achieve his goals.

On Sanders: If the challenge was to show that he could be a candidate for people other than those who already love him, he didn't make much progress toward that goal. But he did come across as more well-versed on foreign policy than in debates past.
The PBS debate in 3 minutes
Quoted
We are in vigorous agreement here.
Hillary Clinton, during the PBS Democratic debate, a night in which she and Sanders shared many of the same positions on issues
South Carolina polling averages
Donald Trump leads in the polls as he faces rivals Marco Rubio and Ted Cruz heading into the S.C. GOP primary on Feb. 20.
South Carolina polling averages
The S.C. Democratic primary is Feb. 27. Clinton has a significant lead in the state, whose primary falls one week after the party's Nevada caucuses.
62% 33%
Fact Checker
Trump’s claim that his border wall would cost $8 billion
The billionaire's claim is highly dubious. Based on the costs of the Israeli security barrier (which is mostly fence) and the cost of the relatively simple fence already along the U.S.-Mexico border, an $8 billion price tag is simply not credible.
Pinocchio Pinocchio Pinocchio Pinocchio
Upcoming debates
Feb 13: GOP debate

on CBS News, in South Carolina

Feb. 25: GOP debate

on CNN, in Houston, Texas

March 3: GOP debate

on Fox News, in Detroit, Mich.

Campaign 2016
Where the race stands
Most Read

politics

federal-eye

Success! Check your inbox for details.

See all newsletters

Close video player
Now Playing

To keep reading, please enter your email address.

You’ll also receive from The Washington Post:
  • A free 6-week digital subscription
  • Our daily newsletter in your inbox

Please enter a valid email address

I have read and agree to the Terms of Service and Privacy Policy.

Please indicate agreement.

Thank you.

Check your inbox. We’ve sent an email explaining how to set up an account and activate your free digital subscription.