The Washington Post

‘Nonessential’ label is upsetting to federal workers

What’s in a word? Plenty, if you’re a federal employee and the word is “nonessential.”

(John Moore/Getty Images) (John Moore/Getty Images)

That’s the term commonly, although not officially, used for employees who would be furloughed in a partial government shutdown, such as the one currently threatened by the deadlock over funding for the fiscal year that begins Oct. 1.

In a similar situation in 2011, the Obama administration estimated that of the 2.1 million federal employees outside the self-funding U.S. Postal Service, 800,000 would be furloughed.

Neither group would be paid for the duration of the shutdown, with those staying on the job almost guaranteed to be paid later but the outcome uncertain for those kept home.

That issue aside, being called nonessential is a bit like being branded with a scarlet letter “N.”

“It makes our job on the Hill a lot more difficult,” said Jessica Klement, the legislative director of the National Active and Retired Federal Employees Association. “There were members of Congress the last time we went through this two years ago who said: If these people aren’t essential, why are they there? Why are they employed? We say these people have a job to do, and that job is dictated to them by Congress.”

John Palguta, vice president for policy of the Partnership for Public Service, said the issue arose at a professional development conference that the nonprofit group held Tuesday for federal human resources professionals. The Partnership has a content-sharing relationship with the Washington Post.

“They are offended at people who suggest that what they’re doing need not be done,” he said. “None of them consider the work they do extraneous and not essential. Federal employees are very sensitive to being the brunt of criticisms of government.”

The stigma of the nonessential label was a main topic of a House hearing amid the most recent partial government shutdown in late 1995.

Said Walter Broadnax, then-deputy secretary of Health and Human Services, “The first casualty of a shutdown is the morale of our employees who were incorrectly termed ‘nonessential.’ I want to make the point clearly that all HHS employees are essential. During a lapse in appropriations, some employees may continue to work as a matter of law, others may not; a distinction made by law, not by the value of their work.”

Officials of the Treasury Department and Social Security Administration expressed similar sentiments. “I also feel that the term ‘nonessential’ must be eliminated from the federal vocabulary. I can’t think of a term more misguided or misleading,” said then-Rep. Constance Morella (R-Md.).

Government shutdown policies in their present form date to a 1980 Justice Department determination that only certain operations legally can continue without an appropriation. Later that year, the Office of Management and Budget interpreted such functions to include, among certain others, “essential activities to the extent that they protect life and property.”

That has been the basis for a string of OMB memos since then, most recently one issued last week. The memos speak of essential activities, however, not of essential employees.

Formally, under OMB and Office of Personnel Management policy,  employees in functions that must keep going are “excepted,” as in excepted from furlough, and those sent home are “non-excepted.”

“Excepted” employees are not necessarily the same as “emergency employees” who must report for work in emergency situations such as severe weather. Employees not subject to a shutdown furlough because they work in functions not affected by an appropriations lapse, such as the Postal Service, are called “exempt.”

Regardless of official terminology, Palguta said, “People revert to the old language. For some the term nonessential means it’s not important. Which is not the original intent.”

“Words do matter,” he said.

The Freddie Gray case

Please provide a valid email address.

You’re all set!

Campaign 2016 Email Updates

Please provide a valid email address.

You’re all set!

Get Zika news by email

Please provide a valid email address.

You’re all set!
Show Comments
The Democrats debated Thursday night. Get caught up on the race.
The Post's Chris Cillizza on the Democratic debate...
On Clinton: She poked a series of holes in Sanders's health-care proposal and broadly cast him as someone who talks a big game but simply can't hope to achieve his goals.

On Sanders: If the challenge was to show that he could be a candidate for people other than those who already love him, he didn't make much progress toward that goal. But he did come across as more well-versed on foreign policy than in debates past.
The PBS debate in 3 minutes
We are in vigorous agreement here.
Hillary Clinton, during the PBS Democratic debate, a night in which she and Sanders shared many of the same positions on issues
South Carolina polling averages
Donald Trump leads in the polls as he faces rivals Marco Rubio and Ted Cruz heading into the S.C. GOP primary on Feb. 20.
South Carolina polling averages
The S.C. Democratic primary is Feb. 27. Clinton has a significant lead in the state, whose primary falls one week after the party's Nevada caucuses.
62% 33%
Fact Checker
Trump’s claim that his border wall would cost $8 billion
The billionaire's claim is highly dubious. Based on the costs of the Israeli security barrier (which is mostly fence) and the cost of the relatively simple fence already along the U.S.-Mexico border, an $8 billion price tag is simply not credible.
Pinocchio Pinocchio Pinocchio Pinocchio
Upcoming debates
Feb 13: GOP debate

on CBS News, in South Carolina

Feb. 25: GOP debate

on CNN, in Houston, Texas

March 3: GOP debate

on Fox News, in Detroit, Mich.

Campaign 2016
Where the race stands
Most Read



Success! Check your inbox for details.

See all newsletters

Close video player
Now Playing

To keep reading, please enter your email address.

You’ll also receive from The Washington Post:
  • A free 6-week digital subscription
  • Our daily newsletter in your inbox

Please enter a valid email address

I have read and agree to the Terms of Service and Privacy Policy.

Please indicate agreement.

Thank you.

Check your inbox. We’ve sent an email explaining how to set up an account and activate your free digital subscription.