The Washington Post

TSA to examine policies after LAX shooting


Federal authorities moved quickly last week in response to Friday’s shooting at Los Angeles International Airport, filing charges the next day against the alleged gunman who fatally shot one officer of the Transportation Security Administration and wounded at least two others.

While law-enforcement action has been swift, examining related TSA policies, including safety issues and screening rules, will take more time.

Authorities have said the suspected shooter, Paul A. Ciancia, a 23-year-old New Jersey native who was living in Los Angeles, carried a handwritten letter saying he “made the conscious decision to try to kill” TSA employees.

(George Frey/Reuters) (George Frey/Reuters)

That raises a few questions for the TSA. Should the agency’s officers be armed? If so, what should they carry? And what does Friday’s incident say about the agency’s recent efforts to change its screening guidelines?

TSA Administrator John Pistole said Saturday that his organization will review its officer-safety policies and make efforts to prevent a repeat of Friday’s incident.

MORE: TSA officers have a thankless job — now one is dead

The TSA does not train its officers to use firearms, nor does it recruit or hire personnel based on their ability to do so. As such, preparing agents for potential shootouts in crowded airports would require a major overhaul of the agency’s mission and the way it conducts business.

Aviation-security expert Rafi Ron discussed this issue in more detail during an interview Sunday with an CBS affiliate.

American Federation of Government Employees president J. David Cox indicated during a news conference on Friday that his group is not interested in arming TSA officers, but he said that some personnel should have arrest powers. “That would be a step in the right direction and an improvement,” he said.

Cox also called for more staffing for the agency.

TSA is not the only federal law-enforcement agency with unarmed officers. The Bureau of Prisons generally prohibits its personnel from carrying weapons at work, although a few exceptions apply: Guards can use batons during emergency situations, and a few prisons have allowed personnel to carry pepper spray as part of a pilot program.

In terms of security standards, the TSA recently pulled back on plans that would allow passengers to carry small knives and other prohibited items aboard planes. The agency had scheduled the changes to take effect in April, but it tabled the idea three days before the deadline amid growing resistance from the TSA union and some lawmakers.

The agency had said the proposed changes conform with international standards and would allow its personnel to focus on finding other items such as explosives.

On Friday, Cox reiterated his group’s opposition to relaxing security rules. “Any type of weapon in a checkpoint area can be volatile,” he said at a news conference. “These officers are assaulted frequently in the line of duty, and we have a lot of on-the-job injuries that occur as a result of the assaults.”

As for screening policies, TSA expanded its pre-screening program to the general public, allowing participating members of the general public to move through select select security lanes without removing laptops, shoes, belts, or light outerwear — although they still have to submit to bag and body screenings.

The pre-screening program had no bearing on Ciansia’s ability to allegedly enter a terminal with an assault rifle. Authorities have said he shot his way through the checkpoint and that he was not a ticketed passenger, meaning he wasn’t supposed to move past the security gates at all.

Follow Josh Hicks on TwitterFacebook, or Google+. Connect by e-mail at  josh.hicks@washpost.comVisit The Federal Eye, The Fed Page and Post Politics for more federal news. E-mail with news tips and other suggestions.

Josh Hicks covers Maryland politics and government. He previously anchored the Post’s Federal Eye blog, focusing on federal accountability and workforce issues.

The Freddie Gray case

Please provide a valid email address.

You’re all set!

Campaign 2016 Email Updates

Please provide a valid email address.

You’re all set!

Get Zika news by email

Please provide a valid email address.

You’re all set!
Show Comments
The Democrats debate Thursday. Get caught up on the race.
The big questions after New Hampshire, from The Post's Dan Balz
Can Bernie Sanders cut into Hillary Clinton's strength in the minority community and turn his challenge into a genuine threat? And can any of the Republicans consolidate anti-Trump sentiment in the party in time to stop the billionaire developer and reality-TV star, whose unorthodox, nationalistic campaign has shaken the foundations of American politics?
Clinton in New Hampshire: 2008 vs. 2015
Hillary Clinton did about as well in N.H. this year as she did in 2008, percentage-wise. In the state's main counties, Clinton performed on average only about two percentage points worse than she did eight years ago (according to vote totals as of Wednesday morning) -- and in five of the 10 counties, she did as well or better.
Upcoming debates
Feb. 11: Democratic debate

on PBS, in Wisconsin

Feb 13: GOP debate

on CBS News, in South Carolina

Feb. 25: GOP debate

on CNN, in Houston, Texas

Campaign 2016
Where the race stands

To keep reading, please enter your email address.

You’ll also receive from The Washington Post:
  • A free 6-week digital subscription
  • Our daily newsletter in your inbox

Please enter a valid email address

I have read and agree to the Terms of Service and Privacy Policy.

Please indicate agreement.

Thank you.

Check your inbox. We’ve sent an email explaining how to set up an account and activate your free digital subscription.