The Washington Post

Inspector general seeks public opinion on Harry Potter stamps

(U.S. Postal Service) (U.S. Postal Service)

The U.S. Postal Service‘s inspector general is seeking public opinion about the recently released Harry Potter stamps as a test of how Americans feel about a new commercial direction for postage.

Inspector General David Williams  is asking stamp fans to weigh in on its blog and wondering whether the fictional British boy wizard created by author J.K. Rowling will “cast a spell” on young collectors as the Postal Service hopes.

“Stamp collecting is seen by some as a dying hobby, as fewer young Americans participate,” Williams’s office said Monday on the inspector general’s blog. Referring to a debate over the series of  Forever stamps the Postal Service issued in November to honor Harry Potter, the office said the controversy “actually underscores a larger Postal Service dilemma: How does it stay relevant among a generation that doesn’t really think too often about stamps or even hard copy communications?”

The Washington Post first reported that the choice of Harry Potter by the Postal Service’s new marketing team had brought attention to an ongoing  battle between the marketers and a committee of high-powered cultural figures that has recommended images for new stamps for half a century. The staff  bypassed the Citizens’ Stamp Advisory Committee in choosing Harry Potter, as it has for several other stamps.

The inspector general asks readers to give their opinions on a brewing debate between traditionalists who believe literary subjects and other cultural figures should grace new stamps, and modernists who are leaning toward commercial images that have  the potential to bring the money-losing Postal Service more revenue.

The blog asks readers:

  • Should the Postal Service market stamp images that focus on a younger audience in hopes of reaching beyond traditional collectors and generating sales?
  • Should the Postal Service be allowed to develop themes and images that do not focus on American heritage for the sake of sales?
  • Or, should stamps be works of art and pieces of history and not based on fads or celebrities?
  • What stamp images would you like to see?
Lisa Rein covers the federal workforce and issues that concern the management of government.

The Freddie Gray case

Please provide a valid email address.

You’re all set!

Campaign 2016 Email Updates

Please provide a valid email address.

You’re all set!

Get Zika news by email

Please provide a valid email address.

You’re all set!
Comments
Show Comments
The Democrats debate Thursday. Get caught up on the race.
The big questions after New Hampshire, from The Post's Dan Balz
Can Bernie Sanders cut into Hillary Clinton's strength in the minority community and turn his challenge into a genuine threat? And can any of the Republicans consolidate anti-Trump sentiment in the party in time to stop the billionaire developer and reality-TV star, whose unorthodox, nationalistic campaign has shaken the foundations of American politics?
Clinton in New Hampshire: 2008 vs. 2015
Hillary Clinton did about as well in N.H. this year as she did in 2008, percentage-wise. In the state's main counties, Clinton performed on average only about two percentage points worse than she did eight years ago (according to vote totals as of Wednesday morning) -- and in five of the 10 counties, she did as well or better.
Upcoming debates
Feb. 11: Democratic debate

on PBS, in Wisconsin

Feb 13: GOP debate

on CBS News, in South Carolina

Feb. 25: GOP debate

on CNN, in Houston, Texas

Campaign 2016
Where the race stands

To keep reading, please enter your email address.

You’ll also receive from The Washington Post:
  • A free 6-week digital subscription
  • Our daily newsletter in your inbox

Please enter a valid email address

I have read and agree to the Terms of Service and Privacy Policy.

Please indicate agreement.

Thank you.

Check your inbox. We’ve sent an email explaining how to set up an account and activate your free digital subscription.