The Washington Post

Congress sheds light on government waste


The House Oversight and Government Reform Committee discussed ways to reduce government waste at a hearing Thursday, with a group of think tanks offering recommendations that ranged from cutting military programs to stopping aid to states.

The groups’ priorities didn’t precisely align, and neither did their recommendations, but they found common ground on several concepts.

Sens. Tom Carper (D-Del.) and Tom Coburn (R-Okla.), who head the Senate Homeland Security and Government Affairs Committee, set the tone for a balanced discussion by testifying first.

Sen. Tom Coburn of Oklahoma. (Melina Mara/Washington Post). Sen. Tom Coburn of Oklahoma. (Melina Mara/Washington Post).

“The problem isn’t that we don’t know what the problem is,” Coburn said. “The problem is that we [political leaders] don’t act.”

Coburn recently released his annual “Waste Book,” identifying $30 billion in supposedly frivolous spending on programs that included a study on romance novels and unused Defense Department blimps.

Carper said cutting waste is a bipartisan issue, adding that “the key is to find that 80 percent that we agree on.”

Falling in line with that idea, the National Taxpayers Union and the U.S. Public Interest Research Group offered a series of proposals they agreed on, including:

1.) Ending “wasteful tax subsidies for agribusiness and other corporations”

2.) Eliminating low-priority and unnecessary defense programs

3.) Improving government operations

4.) Entitlement reform

U.S. Public Interest Group associate Jaimie Woo noted her group often disagrees with the National Taxpayers Union on policy approaches, but he said they are nonetheless “united in the belief that we spend far too much money on ineffective programs that do not serve the best interest of the American people.”

The Cato Institute and Citizens Against Government Waste also testified at the hearing, with both agreeing that the government should privatize some of its functions, among other ideas.

Several witnesses acknowledged that waste is hard to define, but Cato Institute director of tax policy Chris Edwards laid out some parameters, saying the government should focus on trimming “low-value activities.”

“It means government spending on projects that cost more than the benefits they create,” Edwards said. “It means subsidies and regulations that cause individuals and businesses to reduce their productive effort or to engage in unproductive activities.”

Follow Josh Hicks on TwitterFacebook or Google+. Connect by e-mail at  josh.hicks@washpost.comVisit The Federal Eye, The Fed Page and Post Politics for more federal news. E-mail with news tips and other suggestions.

Josh Hicks covers Maryland politics and government. He previously anchored the Post’s Federal Eye blog, focusing on federal accountability and workforce issues.



Success! Check your inbox for details. You might also like:

Please enter a valid email address

See all newsletters

Show Comments
Most Read



Success! Check your inbox for details.

See all newsletters

Your Three. Video curated for you.
Next Story
Josh Hicks · January 9, 2014

To keep reading, please enter your email address.

You’ll also receive from The Washington Post:
  • A free 6-week digital subscription
  • Our daily newsletter in your inbox

Please enter a valid email address

I have read and agree to the Terms of Service and Privacy Policy.

Please indicate agreement.

Thank you.

Check your inbox. We’ve sent an email explaining how to set up an account and activate your free digital subscription.