The Washington Post

Federal travel and conferences: Spending down, as lawmakers consider more restrictions

GSA chief Dan Tangherlini (Andrew Harrer/Bloomberg) GSA chief Dan Tangherlini (Andrew Harrer/Bloomberg)

Federal agencies have slashed spending on travel and conferences in the aftermath of several high-profile abuses, but some lawmakers said Tuesday the government must be careful not to go overboard by restricting productive gatherings that improve government services.

At a Senate hearing on conference and travel spending across the government, top Obama administration officials and three inspectors general who have revealed excesses at the Justice Department, the Internal Revenue Service and the General Services Administration described a new culture of restraint, triggered by both bad publicity and sharp spending cuts.

“At some level, you can’t legislate common sense,” GSA Administrator Dan Tangherlini told the Committee on Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs. “We needed a solid dose of it. We have that now.”

But the $1.1 trillion funding bill congressional negotiators unveiled Monday does attempt to put some restrictions into law, at least for the rest of the fiscal year. Agencies would have to submit reports to their inspector general on any conference that costs more than $100,000 and include the number of participants, the purpose and a detailed breakdown of food and other costs.

Inspectors general also would need to be informed of conferences that cost more than $20,000. Agencies could not send more than 50 employees to an international conference, unless it involves law enforcement personnel.

Tangherlini took over at GSA following revelations that top officials in the agency’s public buildings department held a training conference for 300 employees off the Las Vegas strip in 2010 that seemed to many to be little more than a junket–with a mind-reader, lavish parties in after-hours suites and over-the-top videos celebrating the excess.

New rules put in place by the Office of Management and Budget have resulted in sharply curtailed travel and conference spending, more oversight over what money is spent and increased use of technology to train employees instead of flying them to expensive hotels.

The question on some lawmakers’ minds now is how to ensure that the austerity measures are not a fad that will fade with a new presidential administration. At the same time, several senators said they worry that the meaningful business of government could be stymied by travel restrictions.

“We have to be careful,” said Sen. Jon Tester (D-Montana), explaining that federal employees need to travel routinely to his state to meet with farmers about subsidies and other programs.

“It’s too easy to sit there and pound on one agency because they had an exorbitant conference at the expense of other agencies that are doing their travel right,” Tester said.

Beth Cobert, OMB’s deputy director for management, assured him that it is not the Obama administration’s intention to curtail valuable training for federal employees and meetings with contractors or constituents who deal with the government.

Sen. Tom Coburn (R-Okla.), the committee’s ranking member, is sponsoring permanent legislation that would further restrict travel and conferences, prohibiting an agency from spending more than $500,000 on a single conference, requiring officials to publish on their Web site the minutes, speeches, exhibits, videos and  sponsors of a conference– and several other restrictions.

“There’s a spotlight right now,” Coburn said. “Everybody’s focusing on it. That isn’t going to be the case five years from now. It’s go to be through forced transparency.”

Tangherlini and Cobert did not seem inclined to press for legislation, although the new regulations in the budget bill were not discussed.

“The transparency we’ve put in place will help us maintain the focus we’ve put on this issue,” Cobert told the senator.

Lisa Rein covers the federal workforce and issues that concern the management of government.

The Freddie Gray case

Please provide a valid email address.

You’re all set!

Campaign 2016 Email Updates

Please provide a valid email address.

You’re all set!

Get Zika news by email

Please provide a valid email address.

You’re all set!
Comments
Show Comments
The Democrats debated Thursday night. Get caught up on the race.
The Post's Chris Cillizza on the Democratic debate...
On Clinton: She poked a series of holes in Sanders's health-care proposal and broadly cast him as someone who talks a big game but simply can't hope to achieve his goals.

On Sanders: If the challenge was to show that he could be a candidate for people other than those who already love him, he didn't make much progress toward that goal. But he did come across as more well-versed on foreign policy than in debates past.
The PBS debate in 3 minutes
Quoted
We are in vigorous agreement here.
Hillary Clinton, during the PBS Democratic debate, a night in which she and Sanders shared many of the same positions on issues
South Carolina polling averages
Donald Trump leads in the polls as he faces rivals Marco Rubio and Ted Cruz heading into the S.C. GOP primary on Feb. 20.
South Carolina polling averages
The S.C. Democratic primary is Feb. 27. Clinton has a significant lead in the state, whose primary falls one week after the party's Nevada caucuses.
62% 33%
Fact Checker
Trump’s claim that his border wall would cost $8 billion
The billionaire's claim is highly dubious. Based on the costs of the Israeli security barrier (which is mostly fence) and the cost of the relatively simple fence already along the U.S.-Mexico border, an $8 billion price tag is simply not credible.
Pinocchio Pinocchio Pinocchio Pinocchio
Upcoming debates
Feb 13: GOP debate

on CBS News, in South Carolina

Feb. 25: GOP debate

on CNN, in Houston, Texas

March 3: GOP debate

on Fox News, in Detroit, Mich.

Campaign 2016
Where the race stands
Most Read

politics

federal-eye

Success! Check your inbox for details.

See all newsletters

Close video player
Now Playing

To keep reading, please enter your email address.

You’ll also receive from The Washington Post:
  • A free 6-week digital subscription
  • Our daily newsletter in your inbox

Please enter a valid email address

I have read and agree to the Terms of Service and Privacy Policy.

Please indicate agreement.

Thank you.

Check your inbox. We’ve sent an email explaining how to set up an account and activate your free digital subscription.