The Washington Post

Lawmakers call on Commerce IG to fire top managers after misconduct findings

Commerce Inspector General Todd Zinser. (Commerce Department Inspector General's Office) Commerce Inspector General Todd Zinser. (Commerce Department Inspector General’s Office)

A congressional panel on Tuesday called on the Commerce Department’s top watchdog to fire his top two managers in charge of whistleblower protections after investigators determined they tried to silence two former employees.

The demands stem from an Office of Special Counsel probe that found the senior officials had threatened subordinates with negative performance reviews if they did not sign gag agreements before moving to new jobs.

All of the members of a House subcommittee that oversees the Commerce Department signed a letter calling on the agency’s inspector general, Todd Zinser, to fire the managers immediately. They described the actions as “a thinly veiled effort to intimidate whistleblowers into not reporting misconduct.”

“I would interpret inaction by the IG on this matter to mean support for the two [officials’] actions, in which case we have a bigger problem in that office,” said Rep. Paul Broun (R-Ga.), who heads the subcommittee.

The Office of Special Counsel examined Zinser’s role in the alleged misconduct and found no direct “documentary evidence” that he was aware of it, according to the letter.

Zinser, who was appointed to his position by President George W. Bush, signaled reluctance to fire the officials on Tuesday, saying in a statement that his office had already implemented a number of changes in response to the Special Counsel’s findings.

The corrective actions included removing the managers from supervisory duties for one year, establishing consistent guidelines for employee-separation agreements and destroying all copies of the negative performance reviews.

“We worked cooperatively with OSC throughout their investigation and took their concerns seriously,” Zinser said. “We have moved on and continue to focus on providing oversight of the programs and operations of the Department of Commerce.”

The inspector general also noted that the Office of Special Counsel had closed its case because of the actions that his office had agreed to.

The lawmakers described Zinser’s response to the investigation and its findings as “entirely insufficient and contemptuous.” They said his failure to already fire the senior officials suggests “complicity with the actions of your senior-most staff.”

Zinser accused two of his agents in December 2012 of waging a smear campaign against his office while they were under investigation for filing false expense claims and clocking hours they didn’t work.

The former employees, Rachel Ondrik and Kirk Yamatani, pleaded guilty in May to charges of time and attendance fraud. They agreed to probation and $42,000 each in fines and restitution to the U.S. government.

A U.S. District Court judge allowed the two agents to withdraw their pleas upon appeal after determining that the magistrate judge who handled their cases had not followed proper procedures. The matter is now pending with prosecutors again, according to Steven Levin, an attorney for Yamatani.

Prior to their plea agreements, the two agents filed complaints against Zinser’s office with the FBI, the U.S. Attorney’s Office, and the secretary of commerce, according to records obtained by The Washington Post. However, the Office of Special Counsel said in May that the employees were not involved in the whistleblower case against the inspector general’s office.

Follow Josh Hicks on TwitterFacebook or Google+. Connect by e-mail at  josh.hicks(at)washpost.comVisit The Federal Eye, and The Fed Page for more federal news. Submit news tips and other suggestions to

Josh Hicks covers Maryland politics and government. He previously anchored the Post’s Federal Eye blog, focusing on federal accountability and workforce issues.

The Freddie Gray case

Please provide a valid email address.

You’re all set!

Campaign 2016 Email Updates

Please provide a valid email address.

You’re all set!

Get Zika news by email

Please provide a valid email address.

You’re all set!
Show Comments
The Democrats debate Thursday. Get caught up on the race.
The big questions after New Hampshire, from The Post's Dan Balz
Can Bernie Sanders cut into Hillary Clinton's strength in the minority community and turn his challenge into a genuine threat? And can any of the Republicans consolidate anti-Trump sentiment in the party in time to stop the billionaire developer and reality-TV star, whose unorthodox, nationalistic campaign has shaken the foundations of American politics?
Clinton in New Hampshire: 2008 vs. 2015
Hillary Clinton did about as well in N.H. this year as she did in 2008, percentage-wise. In the state's main counties, Clinton performed on average only about two percentage points worse than she did eight years ago (according to vote totals as of Wednesday morning) -- and in five of the 10 counties, she did as well or better.
Upcoming debates
Feb. 11: Democratic debate

on PBS, in Wisconsin

Feb 13: GOP debate

on CBS News, in South Carolina

Feb. 25: GOP debate

on CNN, in Houston, Texas

Campaign 2016
Where the race stands

To keep reading, please enter your email address.

You’ll also receive from The Washington Post:
  • A free 6-week digital subscription
  • Our daily newsletter in your inbox

Please enter a valid email address

I have read and agree to the Terms of Service and Privacy Policy.

Please indicate agreement.

Thank you.

Check your inbox. We’ve sent an email explaining how to set up an account and activate your free digital subscription.