The Washington Post

Should ‘essential’ federal employees receive additional shutdown pay?


The U.S. government violated federal labor law by failing to provide on-time pay for the legions of federal employees who worked during last year’s 16-day shutdown, a judge ruled this week.

The decision, by the chief judge of the U.S. Court of Federal Claims, raises the possibility that the government will have to pay damages to the border agents, firefighters, prison guards and other civil servants who were required to work during the closure. It is unclear how much that could cost, but the amount would depend upon how many workers join the lawsuit.

About 2,000 federal workers are involved in the complaint right now. The law firm representing them has estimated that up to 1.3 million employees could be eligible to join the suit.

Federal employees who filed the complaint said the government violated the Fair Labor Standards Act by waiting to pay them for their work after the shutdown ended instead of on their regularly scheduled pay dates.

National Park Service personnel remove the barricades from the World war II Memorial as the government reopens. (Astrid Riecken/Washington Post).

In ruling on whether to dismiss the workers’ claims, Judge Patricia E. Campbell-Smith went a step further than either party had asked for at that point in the case, issuing an opinion that the late payments did indeed violate federal law.

Campbell-Smith wrote that “courts have determined almost universally that an FLSA claim accrues, for limitations purposes, when an employer fails to pay workers on their regular paydays, and that a violation of the Act also occurs on that date.”

The judge left open the question of whether the government owes damages, saying such a determination would have to come through another judgment or trial. If the case comes to that point, she said, the government would have to prove that it had “reasonable grounds” for delaying the workers’ pay and operated in “good faith.”

“It may well be that the government can establish these defenses, but its opportunity to do so will come later on summary judgment or at a trial,” Campbell-Smith said. She added that “additional factual determinations [would] remain to be made as to which employees, if any, are entitled to recover damages, if any, to which those employees would be entitled.”

The Justice Department argued that delaying pay was reasonable in light of the Anti-Deficiency Act, which prohibits compensation for employees when congressionally appropriated funds are not available. The agency declined to comment on the ruling Monday, citing a policy of not discussing ongoing litigation.

Shortly before the shutdown took effect on Oct. 1, Congress passed a bill to ensure on-time pay for military personnel and the civilian employees who support them. In their deal to end the shutdown, lawmakers approved legislation to pay federal employees retroactively for the closure period, regardless of whether they worked during that time.

Federal workers in the lawsuit say they endured financial hardship because of the delayed payments.

Heidi Burakiewicz, who represented the plaintiffs during oral arguments, said the ruling represented a first step toward “providing relief” for those employees. “All federal employees – especially those being paid low wages – should get the compensation they need to help make up for hardships caused by the government’s own dysfunction and outright violation of the law,” Burakiewicz said.

The American Federation of Government Employees, a union that represents many of the federal employees who were required to work during the closure, applauded the decision on Monday.

“AFGE is monitoring this litigation closely and, if it appears that damages are available, we will vigorously pursue an action for damages on behalf of the thousands of federal employees represented by AFGE who are entitled to a recovery,” said J. David Cox, the group’s president.

President Obama designated Campbell-Smith as chief judge of the Federal Claims court in October 2013.

Josh Hicks covers Maryland politics and government. He previously anchored the Post’s Federal Eye blog, focusing on federal accountability and workforce issues.

The Freddie Gray case

Please provide a valid email address.

You’re all set!

Campaign 2016 Email Updates

Please provide a valid email address.

You’re all set!

Get Zika news by email

Please provide a valid email address.

You’re all set!
Show Comments
Republicans debated Saturday night. The South Carolina GOP primary and the Nevada Democratic caucuses are next on Feb. 20. Get caught up on the race.
The Post's Dan Balz says...
Rarely has the division between Trump and party elites been more apparent. Trump trashed one of the most revered families in Republican politics and made a bet that standing his ground is better than backing down. Drawing boos from the audience, Trump did not flinch. But whether he will be punished or rewarded by voters was the unanswerable question.
GOP candidates react to Justice Scalia's death
I don't know how he knows what I said on Univision because he doesn't speak Spanish.
Sen. Marco Rubio, attacking Sen. Ted Cruz in Saturday night's very heated GOP debate in South Carolina. Soon after, Cruz went on a tirade in Spanish.
The Fix asks The State's political reporter where the most important region of the state is.
The State's Andy Shain says he could talk about Charleston, which represents a little bit of everything the state has to offer from evangelicals to libertarians, and where Ted Cruz is raising more money than anywhere else. In a twist, Marco Rubio is drawing strong financial support from more socially conservative Upstate. That said, Donald Trump is bursting all the conventional wisdom in the state. So maybe the better answer to this question is, "Wherever Trump is."
Past South Carolina GOP primary winners
South Carolina polling averages
Donald Trump leads in the first state in the South to vote, where he faces rivals Ted Cruz and Marco Rubio.
South Carolina polling averages
The S.C. Democratic primary is Feb. 27. Clinton has a significant lead in the state, whose primary falls one week after the party's Nevada caucuses.
62% 33%
The complicated upcoming voting schedule
Feb. 20

Democrats caucus in Nevada; Republicans hold a primary in South Carolina.

Feb. 23

Republicans caucus in Nevada.

Feb. 27

Democrats hold a primary in South Carolina.

Upcoming debates
Feb 25: GOP debate

on CNN, in Houston, Texas

March 3: GOP debate

on Fox News, in Detroit, Mich.

March 6: Democratic debate

on CNN, in Flint, Mich.

Campaign 2016
Where the race stands
Most Read



Success! Check your inbox for details.

See all newsletters

Close video player
Now Playing

To keep reading, please enter your email address.

You’ll also receive from The Washington Post:
  • A free 6-week digital subscription
  • Our daily newsletter in your inbox

Please enter a valid email address

I have read and agree to the Terms of Service and Privacy Policy.

Please indicate agreement.

Thank you.

Check your inbox. We’ve sent an email explaining how to set up an account and activate your free digital subscription.