Baan Thai and its signature khao soi should be on Michelin’s list of D.C. cheap-eats destinations. (Ricky Carioti/The Washington Post)

There’s no reason to sugarcoat this, so I won’t: The Michelin Guide has a cheap-eats problem.

The famous French dining guide — once the arbiter of taste for many chefs and the public — doesn’t officially label the food “cheap” at the restaurants on its annual Bib Gourmand list, but the word is implied louder than a jackhammer at dawn. For a restaurant to qualify for the list, Michelin’s anonymous inspectors must be able to order two courses and a glass of wine, or dessert, for $40 or less, excluding tax and tip.

Where to start with this mess? How about here: Spending $40 for a meal is not cheap. Not for me, and probably not for 95 percent of Washington (which is why, as the $20 Diner, I aim to keep the meals in the $20 range, though admittedly without alcohol). It’s cheap only by the tortured standards of a guide that clings to an Old European notion of fine dining, with white tablecloths, impeccably dressed servers and sommeliers who dangle silver-plated tastevins around their necks.

Of the 22 restaurants placed on the Bib Gourmand list for Washington’s 2018 Michelin Guide, only two serve what I would consider cheap eats: CherCher, a terrific Ethiopian spot on Ninth Street NW, and 2 Amys, where you can still get a beer and a charred-and-chewy Neapolitan pizza for under $20.

Even some chefs who oversee Bib restaurants in Washington don’t lump their menus into the cheap-eats category. They’ll say their food is “affordable” or “competitively priced.” But they, like most diners with any sense of perspective, will reserve the cheap-eats tag for places that truly aim for a lower price point, like a fried chicken joint or strip-center taqueria.

“Hey, I’m married. I got two kids,” said Rob Rubba, the chef behind the Bib-designated Hazel in Shaw. “Hazel would not be a cheap night out, I can guarantee you that. That would be going out for us.”

“Going out” as in: Going out for a nice meal.


Praveen Fernandes and Sarah Mathews at the bar at Red Hen. (Dixie D. Vereen for The Washington Post)

Michael Friedman, the chef and partner behind Red Hen, has a different definition of cheap eats than the one that Michelin has applied to his Bib Gourmand restaurant in Bloomingdale.

“Going to my favorite taco shop for $2 lengua tacos. That, to me, is cheap eats,” Friedman said. “A great slice of pizza for $3. Those are, for me, the guidelines for quote-unquote ‘cheap eats.’ I would say that in the world of Michelin, obviously you’re dealing on another level altogether.”

Michelin is still relatively new to the universe of American dining. The tire company only started publishing dining guides in the United States in 2005, when it rolled out a little red book for New York City. In the past dozen years, Michelin has already stopped publishing guides in Los Angeles and Las Vegas, ostensibly because the recession put the brakes on such profligate spending, though Jonathan Gold, the Pulitzer Prize-winning critic for the Los Angeles Times, suggested another theory to The Washington Post last year:

In their two editions here, the Michelin ratings seemed uniquely ill-suited to evaluating Los Angeles restaurants, which tend to aspire to different things than the restaurants in Paris. Some of our most imaginative chefs use the same farmers market ingredients, top-rank seafood and sustainably raised meat as the expense account restaurants, but put their creations on tortillas instead of fine china and serve it from the back of trucks. Others serve brilliant tasting menus in barely converted mini-mall pizzerias, or in the back of convenience stores, or in untranslated Chinese.

Gold, I think, gets to the heart of the issue about Michelin in America: Our dining culture is more relaxed, more multicultural and informal, and that trend has only accelerated as Gen Xers and millennials have taken over local restaurant scenes once run by baby boomers, who still had a Rat Pack-era mentality about fine dining, one so Frenchified it smelled of butter and black truffles.

In its first D.C. guide, Michelin seemed to make some accommodations to the American-style of dining (while also awarding stars to air-pinky palaces such as Plume). Rose’s Luxury, chef Aaron Silverman’s Barracks Row restaurant with the mismatched plateware and the quirky, personalized wait staff, earned a star. So did Tail Up Goat in Adams Morgan, a modern Greek restaurant with tables sans linens and chairs that look like they were swiped from study hall.

But Michelin has made few, if any, accommodations with its Bib Gourmands, which seems less a cheap-eats category than a minor-league system for those polished restaurants that haven’t quite made the jump to the Bigs.

Worse, most — and I do mean most — of the 22 Bib Gourmand restaurants on this year’s list would be compromised if a diner were forced to cobble together two courses with a glass of wine (or dessert) for $40. For starters, you wouldn’t have the budget to enjoy a pasta at Sfoglina, Fabio and Maria Trabocchi’s restaurant in Van Ness. Need I remind you Sfoglina is a pasta house? At Doi Moi, you’d probably have to skip the entrees. At Jaleo, you’d be forced to stop eating after two or three small plates, no matter how hungry you still were.

And so on.

So whom does this arbitrary $40 threshold benefit? It mostly benefits Michelin, which can honor deserving restaurants in a category that’s not becoming to most of them.

Chef Peter Pastan, the mastermind behind 2 Amys, has been to a few Bib Gourmand restaurants in Italy, and he’s noticed a difference between the Bibs in the Old World vs. those in the New World. He offered these thoughts about Italian Bibs via email:

Of the few I’d been to, they are family places in every possible way. I assume the family owns the property outright, so no rent to pay, no [community area maintenance] charges, which relieve an enormous burden. They are also multigenerational in terms of who works there: Dad on the floor, Mom in the kitchen, kids helping out, and not to overly fantasize about other people’s lives in the restaurant business, but they have a pretty good life and don’t seem to be driven by ideas of owning a mini-restaurant empire. . . . In much of our country, those types of places have become chain restaurants.

Yet there are such family-run places in Washington. They’re just harder to find. They’re tucked into strip centers or lonely corridors, sometimes run by folks who speak English as a second language and who struggle from month to month since they are paying rents and other fees.


Pan con lechon at Mi Cuba Cafe. (Deb Lindsey for The Washington Post)

These are the true bargain restaurants in Washington, the real Bib Gourmands. They are spots that place a premium on cooking techniques, good ingredients and authentic flavors, regardless of what kind of atmosphere they provide for diners or what kind of surly server sidles up to the table. Restaurants like Baan Thai on 14th Street NW, El Sol Restaurante & Tequileria on 11th Street NW, Federalist Pig in Adams Morgan, Mi Cuba Cafe in Columbia Heights and many more. (There are tons more in the D.C. suburbs, of course, but Michelin remains firmly rooted in the District at this point.)

The tire company, in other words, needs to see cheap eats through the eyes of the average American, not from under the nose of a Michelin inspector who clearly values pampering as much as a well-prepared meal.

Read more:

Michelin adds 3 D.C. restaurants to its cheap-eats list. But is $22 pasta cheap?

The 10 best D.C.-area places to eat on the cheap, because nobody needs a $28 sandwich

The Michelin Guide introduces a new designation — but it’s no big prize

It’s obvious: To Michelin, lower-priced restaurants are an afterthought