Should the Redskins trade draft picks this year for better ones next year?

A common thought on the Redskins, at the moment slated to pick 51st and 85th in the NFL draft that starts Thursday, is that they’ll be able to pick up a player that can challenge for a starting job — perhaps at safety — simply by staying put.

But what if Washington, without a first rounder this year, next and the year after and next year because of the Robert Griffin III trade with the Rams, gave up this year’s No. 51 for a 2014 first-rounder? The general rule of thumb is picks traded in the current year net you a pick one round earlier the following year.

Would the Redskins, who will have salary-cap freedom and ostensibly a healthier star quarterback by then, be willing to take an offer like that? A rookie taken this week would both fill the need in 2013 and be a year further along in his development next season. But the quality of player in the first round could be a cut above what they could get this year, even if the pick ends up being in the 20s somewhere.

It’d be a prudent, long-term move, but it could come at a cost this season. If the Redskins got an offer like that, do you think they should do it?

Reader Old Coach proposed a different scenario to Mike Jones:

If I were the GM — Ha Ha — I would trade this year’s second round pick and next years 3rd round pick and get into the middle of the first round and pick a “great” prospect – safety, corner, whatever.



(1) This year the team is broke

(2) The team has a lot of players but few stars

(3) Next year the team will be able to sign free agents and still have draft choices

I believe the Redskins are about 2-3 “stars away from really winning it all, so I would focus on a corner/safety with my 1st round pick this year and a corner/safety with the 3rd round pick this year, go ILB next year and sign/draft a tackle next year.  Remember – we will probably trade Cousins for a late #1 or #2 next year anyway … even a 3 or a future 1 or 2.


This year I would complete my draft with special teams talent that could grow into great backups – maybe a starter.


(Updated, 1:25 p.m.: The initial blog post suggested that Old Coach and I were discussing the same scenario)

More Redskins and NFL from The Post:

Photos: Mock draft, updated with Darrelle Revis trade

Redskins’ salary cap issues not as bad as they appear

Redskins meet with CB Quentin Jammer

Bucs get CB Revis from Jets for No. 13 pick

Sports Bog: RGIII Twitter Q&A on Will Ferrell, Redskins uniforms, Brittney Griner

Draft coverage, position previews: Safety | offensive line | cornerbacks | running backs | inside linebackers | wide receivers | pass-rushers

Team-by-team draft needs | Prospect reports, sortable by position & school

Redskins’ schedule predictor | Game-by-game breakdown



Success! Check your inbox for details. You might also like:

Please enter a valid email address

See all newsletters

Show Comments
Next Story
Mike Jones · April 22, 2013

To keep reading, please enter your email address.

You’ll also receive from The Washington Post:
  • A free 6-week digital subscription
  • Our daily newsletter in your inbox

Please enter a valid email address

I have read and agree to the Terms of Service and Privacy Policy.

Please indicate agreement.

Thank you.

Check your inbox. We’ve sent an email explaining how to set up an account and activate your free digital subscription.