The in-state/out-of-state question is a huge issue for universities. For hundreds of thousands of college-bound students nationwide, their home-state flagship is either their top choice or one of them.
A Washington Post analysis of the latest available federal data found that at 11 flagships in 2016, more than half of the incoming freshman classes were from out of state. For several small states, that was no surprise. Those low-population states must recruit from throughout their regions to fill classes. The lowest in-state share, 21 percent, was at the University of Vermont. (Go to the bottom of this file to see the full list.)
But some state schools have made a conscious decision to go national. A prime example is the University of Alabama, where 32 percent of freshmen in 2016 were from the state. That was down 34 points in a decade. Alabama, with its national powerhouse football team as a marketing draw, was featured in a 2016 Post article on the move toward out-of-state students.
At West Virginia University, the in-state share was 45 percent, down a few points over 10 years. But university President E. Gordon Gee said he wants to draw as many state residents as possible to the flagship campus in Morgantown. “Our future in West Virginia is to keep our talent in state,” he said.
Out-of-state students help universities in significant ways. They diversify campuses, bringing fresh perspectives and life experiences. They fill seats in states with stagnant or declining population. And of course, they pay more. In-state students at public universities get a huge discount on tuition. Those from elsewhere bring revenue that helps support that discount and offset the long decline in state funding for higher education. College Board data show that tuition and fees for in-state students at public universities this year average $9,970. For out-of-state students, the average is $25,620.
That’s a difference of nearly $16,000.
But there are drawbacks. Politically, it can be risky for prestigious schools to be perceived as giving too many seats to outsiders. And out-of-state students are often wealthier than those from in state, which can hinder efforts to foster socioeconomic diversity on campuses.
Consider the University of Michigan. It is one of the most prestigious universities in the country, public or private. It produces vast amounts of research and serves about 44,700 students. Nearly 29,000 are undergraduates. Of those undergrads, 15 percent come from families with enough financial need to qualify for Pell grants. At many other public universities, the Pell share is twice or three times that. At the same time, Michigan’s in-state share of freshmen has slid. It was 64 percent in 2006 and as high as 67 percent in 2008.
Mark Schlissel, president of the University of Michigan since July 2014, said in a recent visit to The Post that he wants to raise the Pell share and preserve the in-state majority on campus.
“As a public university, we should be much more representative of all kinds of diversity,” he said.
Of Pell-eligible students, Schlissel said, he wants the percentage to be “over 20 at least before I’m done.”
Of in-state students, he said: “I would like to keep the majority of undergrads from Michigan.” He said Michigan offers significant aid programs that ensure students from within the state can attend regardless of financial need.
The Post’s analysis found that the in-state share of freshmen rose at just 6 of the 50 flagships from 2006 to 2016. Those were the universities of Alaska, Delaware, Georgia, Idaho, Maryland and Virginia.
But some flagships have sought in recent years to slow or reverse the out-of-state trend. At the University of California at Berkeley, one of the most prestigious, the in-state freshmen share was 76 percent in 2016. That was up 7 points compared to fall 2014. California and UC officials have made a major effort recently to expand in-state capacity at Berkeley and its sister campus in Los Angeles.
Among highly ranked schools, the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill had one of the highest in-state shares: 83 percent. By policy, UNC seeks to provide maximum access to residents from the Tar Heel state. The same is true for the universities of Florida (83 percent instate) and Texas and Georgia (each 88 percent). That means it is often harder to get into those schools from out of state.
Here are the 50 state flagships, listed in ascending order by the share of freshmen in fall 2016 who came from within the state, according to federal data. Also noted is the percentage point change in that share from 10 years earlier. (Note that the definition of flagships can vary from state to state. This list relies on the College Board’s classification of the public universities. Some states have universities that are effectively co-flagships.)
- University of Vermont: 21 percent (-7)
- University of Alabama: 32 percent (-34)
- University of North Dakota: 36 percent (-8)
- University of Delaware: 38 percent (+1)
- University of New Hampshire: 41 percent (-8)
- University of Mississippi: 43 percent (-11)
- University of Rhode Island: 44 percent (-8)
- West Virginia University: 45 percent (-4)
- University of South Carolina: 47 percent (-15)
- University of Oregon: 48 percent (-17)
- University of Arkansas: 49 percent (-19)
- University of Iowa: 50 percent (-7)
- University of Michigan: 51 percent (-13)
- University of Wyoming: 51 percent (-8)
- University of Colorado at Boulder: 53 percent (-6)
- Pennsylvania State University: 53 percent (-15)
- University of Arizona: 55 percent (-8)
- University of Maine: 56 percent (-21)
- Indiana University at Bloomington: 57 percent (-4)
- University of Wisconsin at Madison: 57 percent (-3)
- University of Kansas: 57 percent (-15)
- University of Oklahoma at Norman: 58 percent (-10)
- University of Kentucky: 61 percent (-13)
- University of South Dakota: 61 percent (-9)
- University of Montana: 64 percent (-7)
- University of Minnesota at Twin Cities: 64 percent (-1)
- University of Missouri at Columbia: 66 percent (-14)
- University of Connecticut: 66 percent (-4)
- University of Virginia: 66 percent (+3)
- University of Hawaii at Manoa: 66 percent (-2)
- Ohio State University: 67 percent (-19)
- University of Washington at Seattle: 68 percent (-10)
- University of Utah: 69 percent (-9)
- University of Maryland at College Park: 69 percent (+1)
- University of Nevada at Reno: 70 percent (-11)
- University of Nebraska at Lincoln: 70 percent (-10)
- University of Idaho: 72 percent (+10)
- University of Massachusetts at Amherst: 73 percent (-4)
- University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign: 74 percent (-14)
- University of California at Berkeley: 76 percent (-15)
- Louisiana State University: 81 percent (-4)
- University of Tennessee at Knoxville: 82 percent (-4)
- Rutgers University at New Brunswick (N.J.): 82 percent (-8)
- University of Florida: 83 percent (-4)
- University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill: 83 percent (-1)
- University of New Mexico: 83 percent (-7)
- University at Buffalo (N.Y.): 84 percent (-3)
- University of Georgia: 88 percent (+3)
- University of Texas at Austin: 88 percent (-3)
- University of Alaska at Fairbanks: 89 percent (+1)
Source: Integrated Postsecondary Education Data System, Washington Post analysis.