This virtual reality experience, played out using an Android smartphone, is the work of medical research nonprofit Alzheimer’s Research UK. The organization’s primary mission is to raise money for research into dementia and other memory-related illness, but it also seeks to raise awareness and empathy for a disease that its leaders say the public still poorly understands.
“They only think about memory problems. The reality of dementia is much bigger than that,” said Tim Parry, director of communications and brand. Thus, Alzheimer’s Research UK wanted to “put someone in the shoes of someone living with the condition.”
As an increasing number of cause-driven organizations have done, the nonprofit group turned to virtual reality. Those experimenting with the technology say it is more accessible than ever before, and offers the best medium to date for evoking genuine empathy for their mission, whether it be medical research, global education or humanitarian relief.
The initial promise of virtual reality technology centered largely around entertainment, adding a new dimension to movies or video games and creating a diversion from the everyday. But projects launched by news outlets and nongovernmental organizations in recent years have demonstrated the technology’s potential to tell real-life stories in more compelling ways. Now, nonprofit organizations are taking that a step further and using virtual reality to build awareness and solicit donations.
Oculus, the Facebook-owned maker of virtual reality headsets, debuted a “VR for Good” program this year that paired 10 nonprofits with filmmakers and provided the teams with funding to create virtual reality experiences that are expected to premier at the Sundance Film Festival in January. The head of the program, Lauren Burmaster, said virtual reality has the potential to combat fatigue among donors who feel disconnected from the results of their money.
“A lot of times people want to see where their money is going but you can’t offer them that,” Burmaster said. “That’s the first thing we’re really seeing — nonprofits using this technology to bring their donors to the work that’s happening.”
The education nonprofit Pencils of Promise garnered buzz last year when it transported a room of its wealthiest donors from a Wall Street gala to a school house in rural Ghana. The organization not only manufactured a 16-foot-wide replica classroom for donors to walk through, but also outfitted them with virtual reality goggles that showed a two-minute video that placed their mind in the classroom as well.
The organization raised more than $2 million that night, and the video has reached 8 million people since then.
“If you see anyone try our VR piece for the first time, immediately their jaw drops,” said Natalie Ebel, the director of marketing. Usually those who open their wallets to Pencils of Promise have never been to the developing countries where the organization does its work. Virtual reality creates an “empathetic connection and presence” more effectively than photos or video, she said.
But virtual reality is not without its barriers and limitations. While the cost of production has come down considerably, the technology required is still more sophisticated and expensive than that needed to shoot regular film or still photography. Production time also tends to be longer, meaning projects need more time and money to deliver.
Not all experiences also allow the viewer to be fully immersed. In the Alzheimer’s Research UK project, for example, the character has a female voice and British accent, which makes it impossible for all viewers to fully connect. The supermarket and other characters were also computer animated, creating another separation between real-world viewers and the artificial scenario unfolding before them. The project had other videos set in real places.
But taking the viewer to a real place and engaging with real people also has its challenges. Amnesty International UK launched its “Fear of the Sky” project as sentiments toward Syrian refugees in Europe were turning sour. The project places viewers on the bombed-out streets of Aleppo as a civilian activist explains the dangers faced by those for whom this is their actual reality.
The project required Amnesty International UK to train and coordinate with activists already on the ground, many of whom took real risks to capture the images necessary to make the project possible.
“There were some difficulties because of the relentless bombing,” said crisis response manager Kristyan Benedict. “It took maybe six or seven times longer than it was meant to in the project plan.”
Still, organizations believe the result may justify the challenges.
“To actually feel that you’re inside Aleppo and … the sense of abandonment and isolation and fear of not knowing when the next barrel bomb is going to drop on you,” Benedict said. “The general consensus was shock.”
“VR is certainly something that’s adding itself to the menu [of tools] that different campaigners can use to tell a story,” he said.
Read more from The Washington Post’s Innovations section.