The Washington Post

Support for same-sex marriage is increasing faster than ever before

Larry Pascua carries a rainbow flag at a celebration for the U. S. Supreme Court’s rulings on Prop. 8 and the Defense of Marriage Act in the Castro District in San Francisco, on Wednesday, June 26, 2013. (AP Photo/Mathew Sumner)

This is a guest post by Andrew Flores, the Public Opinion Project director at the Williams Institute at UCLA School of Law and Ph.D candidate of political science at UC Riverside.

In the past months, there have been two pivotal U.S. Supreme Court cases and numerous lawsuits in several states by same-sex couples seeking marriage recognition. The recognition of marriage for same-sex couples for federal purposes is now in effect. Thus, it’s a good time to take stock of public opinion about same-sex marriage.  My analysis of recent polls generates three key findings:

1) It is much safer to say that a majority of the public approves of same-sex marriage

Below are the 2013-2014 polls on same-sex marriage (compiled from  There are some polls reporting an estimate below 50 percent, indicating that there is still some uncertainty depending on the source of the poll. However, for every one poll that reports less than majority support, there are five polls that report majority support. There is not much evidence that the Supreme Court’s June 2013 decisions produced a major shift in approval. Before the decision, an average of 52 percent supported same-sex marriage.  After the decision, 54 percent did.



The national trend using all surveys asking opinions on same-sex marriage also suggests that the majority of Americans now supports same-sex marriage.  In fact, in the past year, the change in support has increased more rapidly than ever.  (The graph excludes questions that separate out marriage equality, civil unions, or no recognition — but these questions also show that support for same-sex marriage is increasing.)

2) Support for same-sex marriage is accelerating.

Here is some evidence that support for same-sex marriage is truly accelerating.  Below I compare how well two different kinds of trends fit the pattern in the polls: a simple linear trend, which assumes that the rate of change is stable, and a polynomial trend, which assumes that the rate of change is increasing.

The accelerated regression line better fits both the data prior to 2004 and the upward trend after 2012.  Additional statistical tests confirm that the accelerated trend does indeed out-perform the linear trend.

This has important implications for where public opinion is headed. If the stable linear trend were the right one, then by 2016 just over 56 percent of the public would be expected to support same-sex marriage. However, the accelerated trend predicts that support for same-sex marriage will be about 5 points higher by 2016. It is appropriate to infer that opinions are trending positively and changing exponentially as time goes on.

 3) A majority of the shift in attitudes is coming from people’s changing their minds, not more younger, more liberal generations replacing older, more conservative generations.

In a post about a year ago, Nate Silver concluded that about half of the change per year was due to changing minds and half was due to generational replacement. Silver estimated that 1 point of change per year was due to generational replacement.  If that is correct, then anything beyond that 1 percent change a year would be attributable to changing opinions. Taking the 2013-2014 results and forecasting opinion in 2016 using the accelerated trend, I estimate that opinion change is greater than 2 percent a year.  Thus, a majority of the increase in support appears to derive from changing minds.  In short, people who once opposed same-sex marriage are beginning to support it, and this will be the driving force behind any future changes.

Right after the Supreme Court’s decisions in June, Patrick Egan postulated on this blog that the changing views of same sex marriage were more similar to changing views of interracial marriage than of abortion. In the latter case, the Supreme Court’s decision in Roe v. Wade likely hardened preferences, leading to little ebb-and-flow in opinion. In the former case, the Supreme Court’s decision in Loving v. Virginia likely facilitated the upward trend in support for interracial marriage. Given the little evidence of backlash against the recent same-sex marriage cases and the data provided here, trends should continue in the Loving direction.

The Freddie Gray case

Please provide a valid email address.

You’re all set!

Campaign 2016 Email Updates

Please provide a valid email address.

You’re all set!

Get Zika news by email

Please provide a valid email address.

You’re all set!
Show Comments
The Democrats debate Thursday. Get caught up on the race.
What to expect tonight
Tonight's debate is likely to focus on the concerns of African American and Latino voters. Clinton has focused in recent days on issues like gun control, criminal-sentencing reform, and the state of drinking water in Flint, Mich. Sanders has been aggressively moving to appeal to the same voters, combining his core message about economic unfairness with his own calls to reform the criminal-justice system.
South Carolina polling averages
The S.C. Democratic primary is Feb. 27. Clinton has a significant lead in the state, whose primary falls one week after the party's Nevada caucuses.
62% 33%
South Carolina polling averages
Donald Trump leads in the polls as he faces rivals Marco Rubio and Ted Cruz heading into the S.C. GOP primary on Feb. 20.
Clinton in New Hampshire: 2008 vs. 2015
Hillary Clinton did about as well in N.H. this year as she did in 2008, percentage-wise. In the state's main counties, Clinton performed on average only about two percentage points worse than she did eight years ago (according to vote totals as of Wednesday morning) -- and in five of the 10 counties, she did as well or better.
Upcoming debates
Feb. 11: Democratic debate

on PBS, in Wisconsin

Feb 13: GOP debate

on CBS News, in South Carolina

Feb. 25: GOP debate

on CNN, in Houston, Texas

Campaign 2016
Where the race stands

To keep reading, please enter your email address.

You’ll also receive from The Washington Post:
  • A free 6-week digital subscription
  • Our daily newsletter in your inbox

Please enter a valid email address

I have read and agree to the Terms of Service and Privacy Policy.

Please indicate agreement.

Thank you.

Check your inbox. We’ve sent an email explaining how to set up an account and activate your free digital subscription.