“I smell a rat like a lot of Americans,” Rep. Scott Perry, who represents a district in central Pennsylvania, told Carlson. “Nothing’s adding up.”
Las Vegas authorities have consistently described Paddock as a lone gunman. But Perry noted the autopsy report on Paddock has yet to be released.
“But even more troubling than that, recently I’ve been made aware of what I believe to be credible evidence, credible information regarding potential terrorist infiltration through the southern border regarding this incident.”
When pressed for more information, the congressman explained the terrorist group had previously threatened to attack Las Vegas, and after Paddock killed 58 concertgoers Islamic State militants took responsibility for the attack — a boast most experts found unconvincing.
Catherine Lombardo, an attorney representing victims of the attack who was also on the panel, quickly shot down the suggestion.
“We’ve seen no evidence of a terrorist attack,” she said. “I would ask, with all due respect Congressman, unless you have specific evidence to back that up, it seems a bit irresponsible to make that allegation. If you do have any evidence of that, I’m asking you right now.”
“I’m just telling you, I have received what I feel to be . . . credible evidence of a possible terrorist nexus,” Perry answered. “We’re going to have to wait until that situation develops.”
Perry’s office did not return a phone call late Thursday for elaboration on his claims about a terrorist link.
Perry, an Army veteran and member of the House Freedom Caucus, is no stranger to cable news appearances. Last October, he memorably clashed with CNN’s Chris Cuomo over the government’s response to Puerto Rico following Hurricane Maria.
But Perry’s comments on Las Vegas are far from unique in certain corners of the media. Rather, they sync with a wider tapestry of conspiracy theories that have been proliferating since the attack. Antifa, the Deep State, Islamic State militants, leftists and globalists — all have been connected to the attack on radio and podcasts, often confusingly paired together in a massive overarching conspiracy.
A day after the massacre, commentator Wayne Allyn Root (self-professed “warrior for God, guns, gold, tax cuts, term limits, Trump, and that tall, wonderful wall”) tweeted out the shooting was a “Clearly coordinated Muslim terrorist attack.”
This is real thing. Clearly coordinated Muslim terror attack. PRAY for our Vegas police. PRAY for victims. VERY bad. Awful.— Wayne Allyn Root (@RealWayneRoot) October 2, 2017
On Oct. 4, Laura Loomer made an appearance on Alex Jones’s Info Wars to lay out her own theories. “There are a lot of things that suggest that either this is some type of deep state coverup, or that Stephen Paddock has ties to Islamic terrorists,” Loomer said. “Whether it was a gunrunning operation gone wrong, or in fact, he was an ISIS operative himself.”
By the next week, the Gateway Pundit published a piece entitled “Terror Expert Warns: ISIS May Still Have Proof It Was Behind Las Vegas Attack.” But the expert cited, New York Times reporter Rukmini Callimachi, later claimed she made no such assertion.
“Conspiracy theorists have repeatedly misquoted me as saying that ISIS was behind the Vegas attack,” Callimachi told Mother Jones. “To date, zero evidence of an ISIS link has emerged. I am talking both to sources in law enforcement and to U.S. officials in Iraq who are tracking the terror group closely. They have found nothing suggesting that Paddock either interacted with members of ISIS, or was inspired by them — and certainly no evidence that he converted.”
More from Morning Mix: